Abstract: In the process of vigorously promoting the development of strategic emerging industries by the central government, the response behavior and effectiveness of local governments have received much attention, but opinions are divergent. From the perspective of multiple institutional logics, the study analyzes the mechanism, type and effect of the government's response to the central government's new energy vehicle promotion and application policies in nine cities in the the Pearl River Delta. The study found that in the process of the promotion and application of new energy vehicles, the incompatibility of the central government logic, local government logic, market logic and other multiple institutional logic and the heterogeneity of local attributes, especially the heterogeneity of local resources and capabilities, under the interaction, the governments of nine cities in the the Pearl River Delta have gradually formed three different response strategies, namely, "pilot", "support", and "auxiliary" strategies; The differentiated response behavior of local governments has not only achieved their respective goals of new energy vehicle promotion and application and the development of new energy vehicle industry, but also promoted the rapid formation of new energy vehicle industry clusters in the the Pearl River Delta with the "leader" as the core and the "auxiliary" and "supporter" as the radiation. The study provides a new analytical approach based on the perspective of multiple institutional logics to explain the heterogeneity and effectiveness of local government response behavior, and also provides a reference for the implementation of "effective government, effective market".

摘要： 中央政府大力推动战略性新兴产业发展过程中，地方政府的响应行为及其效果备受关注却众说纷纭。本研究从多重制度逻辑的视角出发，分析了珠江三角洲地区九个城市的政府对中央政府新能源汽车推广应用政策的响应行为的机理、类型与效果。研究发现，在新能源汽车推广应用的过程中，中央政府逻辑、地方政府逻辑、市场逻辑等多重制度逻辑的不兼容与地方属性的异质性，尤其是地方资源与能力的异质性，交互作用下，样本城市，逐步形成了三种不同的响应战略，即“领航”、“支撑”、“辅助”战略；地方政府的差异化响应行为不仅实现了各自新能源汽车推广应用目标与新能源汽车产业发展目标，而且推动珠江三角洲地区迅速形成了以“领航者”为核心，辐射“辅助者”、“支撑者”的新能源汽车产业集群。本研究基于多重制度逻辑视角为解释地方政府响应行为的异质性及效果提供了新的分析思路，也为“有为政府，有效市场”的实现提供了参考。