Studies in Science of Science ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 901-912.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on technological innovation efficiency of high-tech industry considering spatial effects─Two stages analysis based on value chain perspective

  

  • Received:2017-04-12 Revised:2018-01-19 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-15

考虑空间效应的高技术产业技术创新效率研究

范德成,李盛楠   

  1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院
  • 通讯作者: 李盛楠
  • 基金资助:

    基于自组织的产业结构演化机制与模型研究;基于低碳经济的节能减排实现路径与绩效评价研究

Abstract: Based on value chain perspective, the innovation process is divided into two interrelated stages of technology R&D and economic transformation. The stochastic frontier model is used to measure the R&D efficiency and economic transformation efficiency of 30 provincial high-tech industries in China during 2009-2015. Then this paper analyzes the influence of spatial effect and other factors on the two-stage efficiency. The empirical results show that there are great differences in the R&D efficiency and economic transformation efficiency of high-tech industries in various regions; the spatial effect has a significant positive impact on R&D efficiency and a significant negative effect on economic transformation efficiency; the firm size has a significant U type relationship with R&D efficiency and a significant positive correlation with economic transformation efficiency; government funding support has a significant negative impact on technology R&D efficiency, and government tax reduction can significantly promote economic transformation efficiency. Finally, according to the overall mean of the two-stage efficiency, various regions are divided into four categories, such as high R&D and high conversion, high R&D and low conversion, low R&D and high conversion, low R&D and low conversion.

摘要: 基于价值链视角,将创新过程划分为相互关联的技术研发和经济转化两阶段,运用随机前沿模型测度中国大陆30个省份2009-2015年高技术产业技术研发效率和经济转化效率,分析了空间效应等因素对两阶段效率的影响。研究发现:各区域高技术产业技术研发效率和经济转化效率均存在较大差异;空间效应对技术研发效率具有显著正向影响,对经济转化效率具有显著负向影响;企业规模与技术研发效率存在显著U型关系,与经济转化效率呈现显著正相关关系;政府资金支持对技术研发效率具有显著负向影响,政府减税行为有利于提高经济转化效率;区域科技水平和区域经济水平影响不显著。最后根据两阶段效率总体均值将各区域分为高研发高转化、高研发低转化、低研发高转化及低研发低转化四种类别。