Abstract: Based on the ambidextrous innovation, this study explores the impact of ambidextrous innovation on the construction of intellectual property capacity under the mediating role of knowledge field. Based on the different leaders' regulatory focus on the choice preference of ambidextrous innovation behavior, this paper explores the moderating effect of the two between ambidextrous innovation and intellectual property capacity. In this study, 378 firms are surveyed to do empirical research. The results show that both the exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation have inverted U impact on intellectual property creation capacity, and have a positive effect on the intellectual property protection capacity, but exploratory innovation has a negative effect on the intellectual property management capacity while exploitative innovation has a positive impact. The activity and openness of knowledge field play an intermediary role between exploratory Innovation and intellectual property capacity, as well as in the path between exploitative innovation and intellectual property capacity, but in different ways. Promotion regulatory focus has positive moderating effect on the relationship between exploratory innovation and intellectual property creation and utilization capacity, and has a negative moderating effect on exploratory innovation and intellectual property protection and management capacity; defensive regulatory focus has positive moderating effect on exploitative innovation and intellectual property creation, protection and management capacity, and has negative moderating effect between exploitative innovation and intellectual property utilization capacity.

摘要： 本研究从企业的双元创新模式选择出发，探究双元创新行为在知识场活性的中介作用下对于企业知识产权能力构建的影响。同时基于不同领导人调节焦点对于双元创新行为的选择偏好，探究其对双元创新与知识产权能力构建的调节作用。对378家不同行业和地区的企业调研数据进行实证研究，结果表明，探索式创新和开发式创新对知识产权创造能力具有倒U型影响，且均对知识产权保护能力具有正向影响，但探索式创新对知识产权管理能力具有负面影响而开发式创新为正面影响。知识场活跃度和开放度在探索式创新与知识产权能力及开发式创新与知识产权能力的路径中均起到中介作用，但作用的方式不同。促进型调节焦点对探索式创新与知识产权创造和运用能力之间的关系具有正向调节作用，对探索式创新与知识产权保护和管理能力之间具有负向调节作用；防御型调节焦点在开发式创新与知识产权创造、保护和管理能力间具有正向调节作用，在开发式创新与知识产权运用能力间具有负向调节作用。