[1]Du J, Leten B, Vanhaverbeke W.Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners[J].Research Policy, 2014, 43(5):828-840
[2]Mei L, Zhang T, Chen J.Exploring the effects of inter-firm linkages on SMEs' open innovation from an ecosystem perspective: An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing SMEs[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 144: 118-128.[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 144(1):118-128
[3]Ho H D, Lu R.Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration[J].Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(5):1026-1034
[4]Rothaermel F T, Deeds D L.Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development[J].Strategic management journal, 2004, 25(3):201-221
[5]Faems D, Van Looy B, Debackere K.Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach[J].Journal of product innovation management, 2005, 22(3):238-250
[6]Xia T, Dimov D.Alliances and survival of new biopharmaceutical ventures in the wake of the global financial crisis[J].Journal of Small Business Management, 2019, 57(2):362-385
[7]Roper S, Love J H, Bonner K.Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance[J].Research Policy, 2017, 46(1):43-56
[8]Cho M H, Bonn M A, Han S J, et al.Partnership strength and diversity with suppliers: effects upon independent restaurant product innovation and performance[J].International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2018, 30(3):1526-1544
[9]Kauppila O P.Alliance management capability and firm performance: Using resource-based theory to look inside the process black box[J].Long Range Planning, 2015, 48(3):151-167
[10]Wu J.Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, 43(2):199-209
[11]Kobarg S, Stumpf-Wollersheim J, Welpe I M.More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level[J].Research Policy, 2019, 48(1):1-10
[12]Lhuillery S, Pfister E.R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data[J].Research policy, 2009, 38(1):45-57
[13]Stefan I, Bengtsson L.Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 120: 252-260.[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 120(1):252-260
[14]He X, Mittal V.The effect of decision risk and project stage on escalation of commitment[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007, 103(2):225-237
[15]Hempelmann F, Engelen A.Integration of finance with marketing and R & D in new product development: The role of project stage[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(4):636-654
[16]Lakemond N, Bengtsson L, Laursen K, et al.Match and manage: the use of knowledge matching and project management to integrate knowledge in collaborative inbound open innovation[J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2016, 25(2):333-352
[17]Gesing J, Antons D, Piening E P, et al.Joining Forces or Going It Alone? On the Interplay among External Collaboration Partner Types,Interfirm Governance Modes,and Internal R & D[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(3):424-440
[18]Guisado-González M, González-Blanco J, Coca-Pérez J L.Exploration,exploitation,and firm age in alliance portfolios[J].Eurasian Business Review, 2019, 9(4):387-406
[19]Manzini R, Lazzarotti V.Intellectual property protection mechanisms in collaborative new product development[J].R&D Management, 2016, 46(S2):579-595
[20]Gama F.Managing collaborative ideation: the role of formal and informal appropriability mechanisms[J].International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2019, 15(1):97-118
[21]Kim H C, Yoon W.Study on types of technology cooperation partner and innovation performance: Focusing on incremental and radical innovation[J].International Journal of Innovation Management, 2019, 23(1):1950005-1-1950005-25
[22]Seo H, Chung Y, Yoon H D.R&D cooperation and unintended innovation performance: Role of appropriability regimes and sectoral characteristics[J]. Technovation, 2017, 66: 28-42.[J].Technovation, 2017, 66(1):28-42
[23]Sun Y, Zhai Y.Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: a scientometric review[J].Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1):203-230
[24]魏江, 李拓宇, 胡胜蓉, 赵雨菡, 张莉.专业服务业创新独占性机制及其作用机理[J].科学学研究, 2018, 36(2):324-333
[25]Zobel A K, Lokshin B, Hagedoorn J.Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness[J]. Technovation, 2017, 59: 44-54.[J].Technovation, 2017, 59(1):44-54
[26]Blindenbach‐Driessen F, Van Dalen J, Van Den Ende J.Subjective performance assessment of innovation projects[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27(4):572-592
[27]余传鹏, 林春培, 张振刚, 等.专业化知识搜寻, 管理创新与企业绩效:认知评价的调节作用[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(1):146-166
[28]Anzola-Román P, Bayona-Sáez C, García-Marco T, et al.Technological proximity and the intensity of collaboration along the innovation funnel: direct and joint effects on innovative performance[J].Journal of Knowledge Management, 2019, 23(5):931-952
[29]高孟立.合作创新中互动一定有助于促进合作吗[J].科学学研究, 2018, 36(8):1524-1536
[30]朱桂龙, 杨小婉.企业的知识披露策略对产学研合作的影响研究[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(6):1062-1070
[31]李梓涵昕, 朱桂龙.产学研合作中的主体差异性对知识转移的影响研究[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(2):320-328
[32]Eriksson P E, Patel P C, Sj?din D R, et al.Managing interorganizational innovation projects: Mitigating the negative effects of equivocality through knowledge search strategies[J].Long Range Planning, 2016, 49(6):691-705
[33]Miozzo M, Desyllas P, Lee H, et al.Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms[J].Research Policy, 2016, 45(7):1337-1351
[34]彭珍珍, 顾颖, 张洁.动态环境下联盟竞合、治理机制与创新绩效的关系研究[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(3):205-220
[35]Laursen K, Salter A J.The paradox of openness: Appropriability,external search and collaboration[J].Research policy, 2014, 43(5):867-878 |