Abstract: With the rise of urban agglomerations and the diffusion of innovation, city cluster-scale innovation systems have recently emerged. As a result, how local governments achieve effective cooperative governance around innovation also poses new challenges to theories on regional innovation. A total of 12 National Innovation Demonstration Zones (NIDZs) have conducted unique Chinese practices of great relevance and academic value to this problem that has not been explained by existing research. This paper attempts to summarize the model of intergovernmental cooperative governance and its characteristics in the NIDZs based on interlocal agreements, combined with cooperative network analysis and content analysis. It is found that three types of network governance models, NAO, NLO and SG, have been formed among local governments based on the scale of cooperation, basis of cooperation, superior involvement and functional arrangement, etc. Based on different resource endowments and innovation conditions, there are two different cooperation orientations of science or industry. And different cooperation models have different advantages and shortcomings in terms of competition, depth and density of cooperation. At last, the practice of NIDZs in intergovernmental cooperative governance has enriched and expanded the existing regional innovation theory. And further promoting innovation integration in the future will also require balancing the fourfold tension between science and industry, policy goals and policy tools, competition and cooperation, and function and coordination.

摘要： 随着城市群的崛起和创新的扩散，城市群规模的创新系统开始不断涌现。由此，城市群中的地方政府如何围绕创新展开合作治理的问题也对区域创新等相关理论提出了新的挑战。对于这一已有研究尚缺乏解释的问题，共计12家国家自主创新示范区进行了极具现实意义和学术价值的独特中国实践。本文以府际协议为数据基础，结合合作网络分析和内容分析，尝试总结示范区中地方政府合作治理的模式及其特征。研究发现：地方政府之间基于合作规模、合作基础、上级介入和功能安排等，形成了行政型（NAO）、领导型（NLO）和共享型（SG）三类治理模式；基于不同的资源禀赋和创新条件，则存在着科技和产业两种不同的合作导向；而不同的合作模式亦在竞合关系、合作深度和密度等方面具有不同的优势和不足。国家自主创新示范区在地方政府合作治理方面的实践，丰富和拓展了既有的区域创新理论，而未来进一步促进创新一体化，则还需要平衡科技与产业，政策目标与政策工具，竞争与合作，以及功能与协作等四重张力。