• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 2124-2130.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

区块链技术社会化的信任建构与社会调适

陈凡1,蔡振东2   

  1. 1. 东北大学科学技术与社会研究中心
    2. 东北大学 马克思主义学院 科技与社会研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-14 修回日期:2020-07-09 出版日期:2020-12-15 发布日期:2020-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 蔡振东
  • 基金资助:
    基于风险认知维度的工程抵制现象研究;新时代文化与科技融合的创新文化研究

Social Adjustment and Trust Construction of Block Chain Technology Socialization

  • Received:2020-03-14 Revised:2020-07-09 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-26
  • Supported by:
    Research on engineering resistance based on risk cognition;Research on the innovative culture of the integration of culture and science and technology in the new era

摘要: 摘要 通过对复杂社会信任模式简化技术需求的有效回应,区块链技术社会化成为可能。在区块链技术由技术1.0向技术3.0迭代发展的技术社会化过程中,其技术信任属性也因此获得完善与发展。进而,促使社会信任的Technique维度获得呈现,并经由对后工业社会之社会信任需求的技术切合,促成了强技术参与的社会信任模式的社会建构。相对于与前工业社会相调适的熟人信任模式,及工业社会的制度信任模式,强技术参的社会信任模式的社会建构在实现社会效率的同时,也引致了社会情感、社会结构的双重社会失范风险。因此,应从法律制度、政策支持、技术标准、技术道德四重维度予以社会调适。

Abstract: Abstract Through the effective response to the simplified technical requirements of the complex social trust mode, the socialization of block chain technology becomes possible. In the process of socialization of block chain technology from technology 1.0 to technology 3.0 inheritance and development its technical trust attribute develops and improves. Furthermore, it promotes the presentation of the Technical dimension of social trust, and through the technical integration of the social trust needs of post-industrial society, it promotes the social construction of a social trust model with strong technical participation. Compared with the acquaintance trust model adapted to the pre-industrial society, and the institutional trust model of the industrial society, the social construction of the social trust model with strong technical participation, while achieving social efficiency, also caused a double social anomie of social emotion and social structure risks. Therefore, social adjustment should be made from the four dimensions of legal system, policy support, technical standards, and technical ethics.