• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 2113-2120.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

新兴技术治理:责任式创新视角的系统性评述

梅亮1,臧树伟2,张娜娜3   

  1. 1. 北京大学国家发展研究院
    2. 青岛大学
    3. 北京交通大学经济管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-16 修回日期:2021-03-09 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 张娜娜
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目;国家自然科学基金青年基金项目;北京市自科基金青年项目

The Governance of Emerging Technology: A Systematic Review from Responsible Innovation Perspective

  • Received:2020-11-16 Revised:2021-03-09 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-15
  • Contact: ZHANG Na-Na

摘要: 纳米科技、基因工程、人工智能等争议性新兴技术的涌现,引发研究与实践关于新兴技术治理的讨论。责任式创新作为科技创新新视角,为新兴技术负外部性与风险性所引发治理挑战提供理论范式基础。研究聚焦新兴技术治理,基于责任式创新视角展开系统性评述,为新兴技术治理的系统化理论研究与政策实践输出启示。研究显示:已有新兴技术的治理研究主要形成了过程视角、行动视角、以及治理体系的结构视角三大研究基础;而以责任式创新范式为基础,新兴技术治理则涌现目标设定视角、行动主体参与视角、价值准则协调视角、过程响应视角、以及制度建构视角的五大研究分支的讨论。

Abstract: The emergence of controversial emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology, genetic engineering, and artificial intelligence, has led to the discussion on the governance of emerging technology in both research and practice. As a new perspective of scientific and technological innovation, responsible innovation provides a theoretical paradigm basis for the discussion on governance challenges caused by negative externalities and risks of emerging technologies. The research focuses on the issue of governance of emerging technologies, and makes a systematic review based on the perspective of responsible innovation, so as to provide systematic implications for the theoretical research and policy practice of emerging technology governance. The research shows that: the existing literature on the governance of emerging technologies involves three research streams, namely the process perspective, the action perspective, and the governance system’s structure perspective. Moreover, based on the responsible innovation paradigm, the governance of emerging technology has emerged five major literature streams, involving the goal-setting perspective, the actor participation perspective, the value criterion coordination perspective, the process response perspective, and the institution construction perspective.