• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 216-224.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    

高校创新基地建立对科技发展影响实证研究

刘传斌1, 刘畅2,杨健安2,王丹2,李昕然2   

  1. 1. 教育部高等学校科学研究发展中心
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-05 修回日期:2023-04-06 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘传斌
  • 基金资助:
    高校科研资源配置绩效评价与调控机制研究;中国工程科技发展战略重庆研究院2022年度咨询研究项目

An Empirical Study on the Influence of Science and Technology Innovation Base on Science and Technology Innovation in Universities

  • Received:2022-12-05 Revised:2023-04-06 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要: 科技创新基地作为国家战略科技力量的第一梯队,高校是科技创新基地的主要依托单位,但少有研究以实证分析回答科技创新基地的建立能否促进高校科技创新发展这一问题。本文采用2008~2017年间中国394所高校的混合截面数据和典型的科技创新基地数据,运用双重差分法研究了科技创新基地建立对于高校科技创新水平的影响,并根据高校所在地区、隶属部门的不同进行了异质性检验。实证表明:第一,整体上科技创新基地的建立显著提升了高校科技创新水平;第二,西部地区科技创新基地的建立对高校科技创新水平影响最强,中部地区效果次之,而东部地区无显著影响;第三,科技创新基地对不同隶属部门高校科技创新水平均具有积极影响。因此,相关部门应充分发挥科技创新基地对于高校科技创新水平的导向作用;因地制宜加强布局建设,尤其是西部高校科技创新基地建设,进一步推进西部高校科技创新发展;应综合考虑多种因素,保障科技创新基地高效开展科技创新活动,带动高校科技创新发展。

Abstract: The science and technology innovation base (STIB) is the first echelon of national strategic science and technology force. Universities are the main supporting units of STIB. However, few studies have answered the question of whether establishing STIB can promote the development of science and technology innovation in universities by empirical analysis. Based on the mixed cross-sectional data of 394 universities in China from 2008 to 2017 and the typical STIB data, this paper examines the influence of the establishment of STIB on science and technology innovation in universities by using the differences-in-differences (DID) method. In addition, the heterogeneity test is carried out according to the different regions and administrative departments. The empirical results show that establishing STIB significantly improves the science and technology innovation in universities. Moreover, the establishment of STIB in the western region has the strongest influence on the level of scientific and technological innovation in universities, followed by the central region, while the eastern region has no significant influence. In addition, the degree of positive influence of STIB on the science and technology innovation of universities in the different administrative departments is similar. Therefore, the administrative departments should take policy guidance to give full play to the guiding role of STIB for the science and technology innovation in universities. At the same time, the construction of STIB of universities in the western region should be given more attention. In addition, various measures should be taken to ensure the science and technology innovation activities in the STIBs, thereby driving the development of science and technology innovation in universities.