• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1113-1120.

• 前沿与观点 • 上一篇    

道德增强是人类走出生存危机的有效途径吗?

周境林1,孙玉莹2   

  1. 1. 复旦大学
    2. 大连理工大学人文学院
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-19 修回日期:2024-11-04 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙玉莹
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委项目“全球视野下我国科研伦理主要议题与战略应对”;国家社科重大项目“当代新兴增强技术前沿的人文主义哲学研究”;国家资助博士后研究人员计划

Can Moral Enhancement Address Humanity’s Existential Threats?

  • Received:2024-03-19 Revised:2024-11-04 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15
  • Contact: Yuying 无Sun

摘要: 随着科技发展,过度消费引发的气候恶化与资源枯竭,以及高科技加持下的恐怖主义威胁着人类物种的存续。众多伦理学家正在探索如何利用生物医学与人工智能来增强人类的道德动机与认知能力,以此应对科技发展下的人类生存危机。然而,时代伦理困境的真正根源在于科技时代下经济社会的极端不平等,只有通过社会分配制度改革才能加以应对。由于道德准则具有权威性、优先性和情感支撑性,社会改革的成败依赖于社会通行的道德准则之改善。基于此,需要设想与论证更注重平等的共识道德理想,指引改善通行道德准则与变革分配制度,进而缓解生存危机。在其中,道德增强只能发挥独特的辅助性作用。

Abstract: Moral enhancement refers to the use of technologies, such as biomedical interventions or artificial intelligence (AI), to improve an individual’s moral motivation or cognitive capacities, thereby fostering moral development and addressing humanity’s existential crises like ecological degradation and terrorism. This topic has become one of the most popular in contemporary applied ethics. In contrast to applied ethics, a significant trend in normative ethics is the study of moral progress, which examines how society as a whole can improve morally. Although closely related, research on social moral progress and individual moral enhancement rarely cross-reference each other. However, the goal of moral enhancement can only be achieved through the moral progress of society as a whole, and social moral progress, in turn, depends on individuals developing relevant motivations and cognitive capacities. This article aims to bridge these two areas, arguing that only by promoting overall moral progress in society – establishing moral principles and distribution systems that place greater emphasis on equality – can humanity’s existential crises be alleviated, and moral enhancement has a unique role within this framework. While technological advancements have brought unprecedented benefits to human society, they have also led to unique ethical dilemmas of our time. Excessive consumerism has resulted in climate degradation and resource depletion, and high-tech terrorism poses an existential threat to humanity. This article argues that these ethical challenges, at its core, stem from the growing socioeconomic inequality created by the market economy in the context of the technological revolution. To address these ethical issues at their root, we argue, there is an urgent need for societal reforms to establish a more equitable distribution system. The success of such reforms depends on transforming moral principles. Therefore, we argue that it is necessary to envision and advocate for new moral ideals that place a higher value on equality, driving improvements in prevailing ethical standards. Social moral progress requires the support of individual moral advancement. Only when a sufficient number of individuals make decisions based on these new moral ideals and act consistently can a new moral system be established and sustained. Consequently, we argue that moral enhancement, as an efficient means of promoting individual moral progress through technological support, may not independently resolve the ethical dilemmas of our era, but it can play a crucial role in this process. The article first reviews the ultimate goals and methods of various types of moral enhancement, briefly assessing their limitations in terms of effectiveness and morality. Next, it argues that the root cause of humanity’s existential crises lies in the extreme economic and social inequality in the technological era, and that without a more equitable distribution system, moral enhancement – even if it overcomes its current flaws – cannot independently resolve this structural issue. The third section advocates for establishing moral ideals that prioritize equality to guide society toward greater fairness. Finally, the article argues that while moral enhancement has unique value in mitigating existential crises, it must be guided by moral ideals, selecting and refining enhancement methods that support a moral system of equal and fair distribution.