• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 529-536.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

区域间技术转移的网络结构及空间分布特征研究——基于我国2006-2010省际技术市场成交合同的分析

刘凤朝1,马荣康2   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学
    2. 大连理工大学经济系
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-27 修回日期:2012-12-11 出版日期:2013-04-15 发布日期:2013-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘凤朝
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目;国家自然科学基金项目

Study on the network structure and spatial distribution of inter-regional technology transfer——Analysis based on inter-provincial technical market transaction of China in 2006-2010

  • Received:2012-08-27 Revised:2012-12-11 Online:2013-04-15 Published:2013-04-15

摘要: 本文利用我国31个省区2006-2010年技术市场成交合同数据,运用社会网络分析和GIS空间分析方法,研究了区域间技术转移的网络结构及空间分布特征。结果表明:(1)2006年以来,我国省际技术转移活动越来越密切和频繁,随着各区域技术实力及区域间技术差距的变化,技术转移网络以北京为中心的“核心—边缘”结构有逐步削弱的趋势。(2)大宗技术转移以北京为核心向其他区域扩散,受地理距离的约束较小;整体技术转移表现为空间聚集(分散)形态各异的几个区域板块,地理距离在各区域板块演变中的作用存在一定差异。(3)随着各区域及其邻近区域技术实力的变化,区域间技术转移的实现路径表现为由“弱—弱”子群转变为“强—弱”子群或“弱—强”子群,最后发展为地理邻近且良性互动的“强—强”子群。

关键词: 区域, 技术转移, 网络结构, 空间分布, regional, technology transfer, network structure, spatial distribution

Abstract: Taking advantage of 2006-2010 bilateral data of technical market transaction between regions in China, This paper investigates the network structure and spatial feature of inter-regional technology transfer through the social network analysis and GIS spatial analysis. Results show that, firstly, the inter-provincial technology transfer activities become increasingly frequent since 2006. With the changes of regional technology capacity and technology gap among regions, the “core-periphery” structure of inter-regional technology transfer network with Beijing as the central is getting weaken. Secondly, the bulk technology transfer is spreading to other regions with Beijing as the central, which is barely constrained by geographical distance. The whole technology transfer shows several regional blocks with various forms of spatial aggregation or dispersion, and the geographical distance plays different roles in the evolution of each regional block. Finally, with the changes of technology capacity in each region and its adjacent regions, the regional blocks evolve from ‘weak-weak’ subgroup to ‘strong-weak’ subgroup or ‘weak-strong’ subgroup, and then move to ‘strong-strong’ subgroup with good interaction.

中图分类号: