• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 1453-1458.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

行动视域下隐性知识探析——基于波兰尼视角和“行动的体现”理论的考究

郑作龙1,朱凤青2,孟庆伟2,黄富强3   

  1. 1. 黑龙江省农垦经济研究所
    2. 哈尔滨工业大学
    3. 山东大学
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-19 修回日期:2012-12-18 出版日期:2013-10-15 发布日期:2013-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 郑作龙

Research on Tacit Knowledge in the Sight of the Action——Based on research of Polanyi 's tacit knowledge and “the Shape of Actions”

  • Received:2012-09-19 Revised:2012-12-18 Online:2013-10-15 Published:2013-10-15

摘要: 对争论中隐性知识的理解与界定进行概述,归纳总结了隐性知识的两种类型:尚未被形式化的知识与不能被形式化的知识,并指出其存在的主要原因是:由于形式化手段未创新,现有技术手段无法将隐性知识形式化;隐性知识本质属性决定其不能被完全形式化。通过回溯波兰尼“骑自行车的能力”案例和引入Collins & Kusch“行动的体现”理论,对隐性知识“何以可能”做了案例性和理论性分析;最后提出“回到行动中理解隐性知识”的路径,认为隐性知识存在个体身心、特定情境下以具体行为体现,涉身性、情境化、实践过程性是其本质属性,隐性知识难以被完全编码化及形式化表示。

关键词: 隐性知识, 行动的体现, 涉身性, 情境化, 实践过程性, tacit knowledge, the shape of actions, embodiment, contextualization, practice process

Abstract: The paper begins with analysis of current definitions of tacit knowledge argument, summarized two types of tacit knowledge: knowledge has not yet been formalized and can not be formalized, pointed out the reasons: current technical methods can not formalize tacit knowledge because of not been innovated yet; nature of tacit knowledge. Basing on recalling the Polanyi tacit knowledge and introducing Collins & Kusch's “the Shape of Actions”, researched tacit knowledge "possibility" by analyzing the case and theory, proposed a way for understanding tacit knowledge, argued that tacit knowledge resides “in the head” of people, embodied by the behavior in specific situation, essential attributes include embodiment, contextualization, practice process. Tacit knowledge is difficult to be completely codified and formalized representation.

中图分类号: