欢迎访问《科学学研究》官方网站，今天是
分享到：
  • 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053　CN 11-1805/G3
科学学研究

›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (12): 1796-1803.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

道德推脱、旁观者沉默与学术不端

陈银飞   

  1. 江苏大学财经学院
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-06 修回日期:2013-10-23 出版日期:2013-12-15 发布日期:2013-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 陈银飞
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“心理接近、伦理距离与供应商伦理管理：基于有限道德的伦理判断偏差的中介效应”

Moral Disengagement, Bystander Silence and Academic Misconduct

  • Received:2013-06-06 Revised:2013-10-23 Online:2013-12-15 Published:2013-12-26

摘要： 个体压力、个体科研素质与科研环境均是学术不端的重要影响因素。本研究依据有限道德研究的最新进展研究个体压力、个体科研素质、科研环境如何通过道德推脱的中介影响学术不端的程度以及旁观者沉默对学术不端程度的影响。基于419份对中国科研工作者问卷调查的实证研究表明：科研环境与个体素质对学术不端行为基本没有直接影响，个体压力虽然对学术不端有直接影响，但影响较小；而通过道德推脱的中介作用，个体压力、个体素质与科研环境对学术不端的间接影响程度比较大；此外，旁观者沉默对学术不端也有显著的正向影响。

关键词: 道德推脱, 旁观者沉默, 学术不端, moral disengagement, bystander silence, academic misconduct

Abstract: Pressure exerted on the individual researcher, his/her academic quality and the academic environment are the main causes of the academic misconduct. Based on the latest achievements in the study of bounded morality, the present paper explores the effect of these three factors mediated by moral disengagement and the influence of bystander silence on academic misconduct. A questionnaire survey of 419 Chinese researchers shows that although the academic environment and their academic quality exercise almost no direct influence and the pressure they feel produces only little direct influence on their academic misconduct, the effect of these three factors mediated by moral disengagement and the influence of stander silence on their academic misconduct are quite significant.