• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 501-507.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

贝尔实验室与舍恩事件调查——科研机构查处科学不端行为的案例研究

王阳1,张保光2   

  1. 1. 南开大学哲学院
    2. 北京住宅建设总集团第二公司
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-01 修回日期:2013-11-05 出版日期:2014-04-15 发布日期:2014-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 王阳
  • 基金资助:
    《中国大学处理学术不端的机制和组织机构研究》

Bell Lab and Investigation on Schon Affair

  • Received:2013-08-01 Revised:2013-11-05 Online:2014-04-15 Published:2014-04-16
  • Supported by:
    the studies of mechanism to deal with scientific misconduct in Chinese university

摘要: 舍恩事件调查是美国科研诚信历史上极为规范的科研机构独立调查案例,其负责人默里由于监管工作获得2005年度美国物理学会的佩克管理奖。2002年5月,美国贝尔实验室吸取了此前内部调查小组调查舍恩失败的教训,建立了由外部五位知名业内专家组成的独立调查小组——蓝丝带小组。调查小组历经询问、调查和判定三个阶段,于2002年9月出具调查报告,以大量证据支持舍恩蓄意犯有科研不端行为。该调查报告提到的“合作者责任”,计算机时代的实验记录,实验室内部评审机制问题构成了贝尔实验室乃至于整个科学界改善科研管理体制的直接动因。

关键词: 舍恩案例, 科研不端行为调查, 贝尔实验室, 蓝丝带小组, 合作者责任, Schon affair, investigation of scientific misconduct, Bell Lab, Blue-ribbon Unit, cooperator responsibility

Abstract: The investigation of Sch?n affair is the case that is extreme standard and is investigated by scientific research institution independently in the history of the United States about science and research integrity, in which Murray in charge of the case got Peck Management Award issued by the American Physical Society in 2005 because of her regulatory work carried out at the Bell Labs. In May 2002, Bell laboratory of the United States learned lessons from the failure the internal investigation team had investigated Sch?n and established an independent investigation team(Blue Ribbon Unit) composed of five experts who are well-known in their fields. The investigation team adopted three investigation stages of inquiry, investigation, and adjudication during the investigation and finally wrote investigation report in September 2002, finding Sch?n committed scientific misconduct on the basis of the bulk of evidence. The report mentioned a lot of more complex problem, such as the responsibilities of collaborators, the record of the experiments in the age computers were widely used, the review mechanism inside the lab. These problems are the direct cause that the Bell laboratory and the entire scientific community commit themselves to improving the scientific research management system.