• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 724-734.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

研发投资:企业行为,还是行业特征?

孙晓华1,李明珊2   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-06 修回日期:2014-01-23 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 孙晓华
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科基金资助项目“市场圈定约束下整机带动零部件技术升级的机制创新、纵向关系治理与政策设计”;国家自然科学基金资助项目“产学研技术联盟中的技术对接机制研究”

R&D Investment: Enterprise Behavior Or Industry Characteristics?

  • Received:2013-08-06 Revised:2014-01-23 Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-05-13

摘要: 研发投资是增强企业创新能力和竞争力的重要途径,我国企业研发投资面临着投入强度低和分布不均衡的问题。与现有研究不同,本文通过研发投资的行业特征分析,从企业和行业两个层面构建了企业研发投资的决定模型,以2005-2007年中国工业企业微观数据为样本,实证检验了各因素对企业R&D强度的影响,进而利用夏普里值分解法就企业研发投资差异的来源进行了探讨,得到如下结论:微观层面,生产规模、企业年龄、资产负债率与R&D强度显著负相关,企业性质对研发决策也具有显著影响;行业层面,平均研发强度、市场集中度和外部筹资环境对研发投资存在显著的正效应,新产品销售收入占比和研发集中度则具有明显的抑制作用;根据夏普利值的分解结果,行业因素对企业研发投资差异的平均贡献高达86.5%,企业因素的贡献度仅为13.5%,表明企业研发投资的差异主要源于行业特征的不同,而不是企业行为异质性的结果。

关键词: R&D investment, industry characteristics, enterprise behavior, Shapley value decomposition method

Abstract: R&D investment is the key to change economic development pattern and enhance the industrial competitiveness. While Chinese enterprise faced with both low intensity and skew distribution of firm R&D investment. Unlike existing research, this paper is going to analysis the industry characteristics of R&D investment, and present a decision model of enterprise R&D investment by two fields which are enterprise and industry. We use a micro-data of Chinese manufacturing industries from 2005 to 2007 as samples to test the factors of firm R&D intensity. Moreover, we discusses the differences of enterprise R&D investment by Shapley value decomposition method, and gets the following conclusions. At micro-level, the intensity of R&D has significant negative correlations with production scale, firm age and asset-liability ratio, and enterprise property also effects the R&D decisions hardly. In addition, industry level factors such as average R&D intensity, market concentration and the environment of external financing has significant positive effects to firm R&D investment. However, there are obvious inhibitive effects from the ratio of new products’ sales revenue and R&D concentration. According to the analysis of Shapley value, industry factors contributes the 86.5% to the differences of firm R&D investment, and enterprise factors only contributes the 13.5%. In conclusion, the differences of investment in research and development are because of the different industries characteristics, not the enterprise behavior.