• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 49-56.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国OFDI国别差异与母国技术进步

陈昊1,吴雯1,2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学经济学院
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-25 修回日期:2015-06-16 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈昊
  • 基金资助:

    国家软科学研究计划项目;上海未来三十年发展战略研究课题

Country Difference of Chinese OFDI and Technological Progress

  • Received:2015-03-25 Revised:2015-06-16 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-20

摘要: 按东道国研发资本密集程度,中国对外直接投资流向研发资本密集的发达国家和研发资本稀疏的转型及发展中国家。本文建立了中国对外直接投资国别差异与母国技术进步的机制模型,并利用2003-2012年省际面板数据,通过工具变量固定效应方法(IVFE)进行了实证检验,结果显示:对外直接投资国别差异对我国技术进步存在显著不同影响,其中我国对发达国家对外直接投资能够获得逆向技术溢出,对转型及发展中国家对外直接投资不能获得逆向技术溢出,反而产生正向技术输出;我国对发达国家对外直接投资获得的逆向技术溢出通过人力资本消化吸收;我国对转型及发展中国家对外直接投资产生的正向技术输出通过国内研发成本分摊部分回收。

Abstract: According to R&D-intensity of host country, Chinese OFDI flows to developed countries that are R&D-intensive and to transition and developing economies that are R&D-extensive. This paper constructs a theoretical mechanism and model of the country difference of Chinese OFDI and technological progress, and also conducts an empirical analysis based on the China’s inter-provincial panel data from 2003 to 2012 and the approach of IVFE. The results show that the country difference of Chinese OFDI has significantly different effects on technological progress. China can acquire the reserve technology spillover from developed countries, but not the transition and developing countries. In contrast, China produces positive technology output to them. The total amount of the reserve technology spillover from developed countries is digested and absorbed by the human capital. The total amount of positive technology output to transition and developing countries is partly shared and recovered by home R&D cost.

Key words: R&, D Cost Sharing