• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. ›› Issue (8): 1121-1130.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

STS科学民主化争论的还原与分析

白惠仁   

  1. 中国科学院大学人文学院
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-30 修回日期:2016-06-19 出版日期:2016-08-15 发布日期:2016-08-23
  • 通讯作者: 白惠仁

The Reduction and Analysis on the Debate of Democratization of Science in the Field of STS

  • Received:2015-12-30 Revised:2016-06-19 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2016-08-23

摘要: 柯林斯和埃文斯的“科学的社会研究的第三波理论”发表后,引起了贾撒诺夫和温尼关于科学民主化问题的激烈反响,科学技术论(STS)研究陷入了关于科学决策的公众参与限度的争论当中。争论双方着重关注于科学本身,未充分认识到民主的地方性,尤其是不同民主理念背后的哲学基础,在民主化方面过于草率地沿袭了现成的民主理念。因此,争论的本质是民主化的理由是什么以及何种民主理念适用于科学的民主化。对这场争论的民主理念和价值承诺的还原,将促进对科学民主化理论基础的理解。

Abstract: After the publication of ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’ by Harry Collins and Robert Evans, Sheila Jasanoff and Brian Wynne both expressed their views on democratization of science of great difference, then the two sides fall into the debate of the limit of participation. The two sides focus on science, but ignored the locality of democracy especially and followed the current democratic ideals without rethinking. Therefore, the essence of the debate lies on which democratic ideal is suitable for democratization of science. Political philosophy analysis will promote the understanding of the theoretical basis of democratization of science.