• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 879-885.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

科研组织一般竞争优势的解析与实证检验

李慧聪1,霍国庆2,3   

  1. 1. 北京工商大学商学院
    2. 中国科学院大学
    3.
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-06 修回日期:2016-09-02 出版日期:2017-06-15 发布日期:2017-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 李慧聪
  • 基金资助:

    北京市自然科学基金“北京市金融机构治理合规评价及有效性研究”

Empirical Study and Analysis of Generally Competitive Advantage on Research Institutions: Based on analysis of Value

  • Received:2016-07-06 Revised:2016-09-02 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2017-06-15

摘要: 为研究超强竞争环境下科研组织在“本源价值”层面的竞争优势,在对科研组织竞争优势从知识发现和知识应用层面进行结构化解析的基础上,以中国科学院102家研究所为样本进行了实证检验,结论如下:(1)科研组织的竞争优势是能够确保科研组织持续实现价值最大化的资源与能力组合;(2)基于知识发现与知识应用的价值分析,科研组织的竞争优势解析为系统和持续积累的数据库/样本库、持续解决重大战略问题的能力、持续转化知识技术为现实生产力的能力;(3)相比不具有上述竞争优势的科研组织,具有上述竞争优势的科研组织在价值表现方面更为突出;(4)科研组织应针对竞争优势缺失型、弱化型或徘徊型采取不同的培育对策。

Abstract: To study research institutions’ competitive advantage in the super-competitive environment, this paper structured analyzes it from knowledge discovery and application. We select 102 institutes of Chinese Academy of Sciences as empirical test samples and get the following conclusions. (1) Competitive advantage of research institutions is a combination of resources and capabilities, which is able to maximize its long-term value. (2) Based on knowledge discovery, we need systematic and sustained accumulation study samples and continue to cultivate large sample / big data analysis capability for discovering the rules of development continuously. Based on knowledge application, the keys are to cultivate the abilities to solve major national strategic issues and transfer technological achievements. (3) Compared to the research institutions do not have a competitive advantage above-mentioned, the ones with the competitive advantage is more prominent in terms of performance value. (4) Research institutions for competitive advantage deletion, weakened or wandering should take different counter measures.

中图分类号: