• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1264-1272.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

债权融资是否推动了企业创新绩效——来自治理二元性理论的动态解释

王旭1,褚旭2   

  1. 1. 山东财经大学工商管理学院
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-26 修回日期:2017-02-16 出版日期:2017-08-15 发布日期:2017-08-23
  • 通讯作者: 王旭
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社科青年项目:银行债权治理与企业双元性技术创新协同——基于多重情境的调节作用;国家自然科学基金面上项目:社会资本二重性作用机制研究:以战略柔性/战略惯性为中介的视角;国家自然科学基金青年项目:集团框架内子公司动态竞争行为决策动因及协同效应——基于多层次情境因素的研究;山东省自然科学基金面上项目:多重视角下社会企业整体性治理与系统评价研究

Can debt financing facilitate innovation performance?——an dynamic explanation from the perspective of governance duality

  • Received:2016-09-26 Revised:2017-02-16 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2017-08-23

摘要: 债权融资与企业创新的关系始终存在理论冲突和实践争论。本研究尝试引入治理二元性理论和企业生命周期理论作为解释依据,在分析银行债权融资的关系治理和契约治理的治理特征和治理机理的基础上,结合创新风险在企业生命周期中的分布规律,利用高科技上市公司面板数据,实证检验关系治理和契约治理对创新绩效的动态影响,以全面揭示债权融资与创新绩效的关系。研究表明:创新溢价驱动下的银行债权关系治理机制具有创新包容特征,有利于保证企业创新投入的连续性。而风险规避驱动下的契约治理机制具有创新保守特征,能够帮助债权人控制创新风险;从创新风险的分布规律来看,企业创新活动为银行引致的环境风险主要分布在成长期和蜕变期,而道德风险主要分布在蜕变期;债权治理对创新绩效的影响方面,契约治理能够显著促进成长期企业的创新绩效,而关系治理的促进作用集中在成熟期,但两种治理机制在企业蜕变期均表现出对创新绩效的显著抑制作用。

Abstract: The theoretical and practical conflicts concerning the relationship between debt financing and innovation performance have existed for a long time. This paper has introduced governance duality theory and enterprises’ life cycle theory as theory explanation, and tested the impact of both relational and contractual governance upon innovation performance around enterprises’ life cycle based on the study of the features and mechanisms of both relational governance and contractual governance of bank debt financing and the innovation risk distribution around enterprises’ life cycle as well. Is has been found out that driven by innovation premium, banks’ relational governance possesses innovation tolerance feature and can advance the constancy of innovation input. While the contractual governance possesses innovation conservation feature, and can help bank control innovation risk. Since the environmental risk brought by innovation activity is distributed in both growing and transforming periods and the moral risk is mainly distributed in the latter one, the contractual governance can boost innovation performance of corporations in growing period, while the boost effect of relational governance has shown in mature period. However, when comes to the transforming period, both of them have shown restraining effect towards innovation performance.

Key words: enterprises&rsquo, life cycle