• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1170-1179.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

STS领域的知识图谱——基于贝尔纳奖获得者共被引分析

李淑敏1,李正风2   

  1. 1. 中国科学技术大学
    2. 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-26 修回日期:2017-11-23 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2018-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 李淑敏

Mapping STS: Based on Author Co-Citation Analysis of Bernal Prize Recipients

  • Received:2017-09-26 Revised:2017-11-23 Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-25

摘要: 通过对贝尔纳奖获得者进行作者共被引分析,采取多元分析和社会网络分析相结合的方法,绘制STS领域的知识图谱。分析结果表明,其存在七个学术子群,并确定了各子群的主题,按因子分析方差贡献率从大到小依次为“SSK微观进路”、“科学技术的女性主义研究”、“科学体制社会学”、“技术论”、“争论与风险研究”、“SSK宏观进路”、“科技史”;获奖者在研究内容上存在大量交集,研究主题渗透交叉、依赖较紧密;尽管Thomas Kuhn是人文社会科学领域中影响最大的STS学者,但在STS学术共同体中,Bruno Latour影响力却是最大。

Abstract: Taking author co-citation analysis of Bernal Prize recipients as a method, this study combines the technologies of multivariate analysis and social network analysis to visualize the intellectual structure of STS field by using the SPSS and Ucinet software. The results show there are seven academic subgroups. We identify the subjects of each subgroup and list in descending order by weight in factor analysis: micro-level approach of SSK, feminist studies of science and technology, institutional sociology of science, technology studies, controversy and risk studies, macro-level approach of SSK, history of science and technology. The recipients’ research contents intermingle a lot, and research subjects permeate each other alternately. Bruno Latour is the most influential scholar in STS field, although Thomas Kuhn is the most influential STS scholar in the field of humanities and social science.