Abstract: More and more related works in the history of science have been presented in the first stage in China in recent years, yet critical comments continues arisen. Taking history of science works about Boyle as example, this paper discusses the rationality of the reconstruction of scientific history Based on the dimension of scientific historiography. We would figure out that affected by different PS, the different HS as a part of history, which is a simplified, idealized from “real” history. Only by realizing the role of philosophy of science in the history of science we would "make" the philosophy of science better, and take more understanding of the history of science.