• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 193-199.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

科学与社会秩序共生的理论探索

尚智丛1,田喜腾2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院大学
    2. 新乡医学院
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-07 修回日期:2019-10-08 出版日期:2020-02-15 发布日期:2020-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 尚智丛
  • 基金资助:
    科学知识的民主问题研究

A Theoretical Exploration on the Co-production of Science and Social Order

  • Received:2019-05-07 Revised:2019-10-08 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-15

摘要: 20世纪后半叶,科学与社会秩序的共生现象凸显,即人类实践生产事实、重塑自然的过程与形成社会秩序和规范的过程紧密交织。共生过程中科学知识与社会秩序如何确立彼此?共生通过哪几个方面而实现?共生受到哪些文化与社会因素的影响?自20世纪70年代起,学者们先后从构成性共生、互动性共生来研究,贾萨诺夫又明确提出共生理论和秩序工具以及公民认识论、社会技术意象和法治主义等概念,加以解释。近十年间,共生理论逐步成型,成为新兴交叉学科科学技术论(Science & Technology Studies)的核心理论,为分析知识社会和知识政治提供了理论框架。目前,该理论有待更广泛的经验性比较研究来加以完善。

关键词: 科学技术论, 知识, 科学, 社会秩序, 共生

Abstract: In the latter half of the 20th century, science and social order are more closely co-produced together, that is, the fact-producing and nature reshaping process in human practices are closely intertwined with the process of social order-building and social norms-constructing How scientific knowledge and social order are specifically established in the process? And how does cultural and social factors play a role in the process? Since the 1970s, scholars have already attempted to make explanations based on various researches, disclosing patterns of constitutive and interactional co-production, co-producing instruments and important factors, such as civic epistemologies, sociotechnical imaginaries, and constitutionalism. In the past decade, the theory of co-production has gradually become more sophisticated, constituting the core theory and a new research turn in the field of Science and Technology Studies, providing a powerful theoretical framework for analyzing the knowledge society and knowledge politics. The theory is still in need of being further developed by more extensive empirical and comparative studies.