• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 357-372.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

职能背景、团队冲突与企业创新

刘鑫1,李小玉2,3,薛有志4   

  1. 1. 河北工业大学经济管理学院
    2.
    3. 中国民航大学
    4. 南开大学
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-25 修回日期:2019-05-30 出版日期:2020-02-15 发布日期:2020-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘鑫
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目:中国现代企业CEO遴选机制研究

Group Conflict and Firm Innovation: A Theoretical Construct of CEO Integration On the Basis of Dual Conflict Perspective

  • Received:2019-02-25 Revised:2019-05-30 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-15

摘要: 基于双元冲突的视角构建理论模型,聚焦于高管团队冲突过程,动态分析了CEO特征整合情境下的高管团队职能背景多样性对企业创新绩效的影响机理。以2009年至2016年沪深A股上市公司为样本,运用泊松回归模型实证研究高管团队职能背景多样性对企业创新绩效的影响以及CEO能力、权力和关系三个维度特征所发挥的情境作用。研究结果表明:在企业创新过程中,高管团队职能背景多样性引起的情感冲突相比于认知冲突发挥更为主导性的作用,对企业创新绩效具有破坏作用;CEO职能背景丰富性和CEO与高管团队成员共同经历减弱了高管团队职能背景多样性对企业创新绩效的破坏效应;CEO权力增强了这种破坏效应。基于双元冲突视角聚焦冲突过程动态剖析高管团队职能背景多样性对企业创新绩效的影响机理突破了原有研究静态的分析框架,有助于打开“团队多样性—企业经营后果”的“黑匣子”,同时对企业有效提升创新绩效具有一定指导意义。

Abstract: On basis of a perspective of dual conflict, the paper establishes a theoretical construct in hope of dynamically elaborating how the diversity of TMT functional background affects firm innovation under the integration of CEO’s characteristics. Based on the data from public listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in China from the year 2009 to 2016, by employing Poisson model, the paper systematically analyzes and empirically examines the relationship between the diversity of TMT functional background and firm innovation performance, and the moderating effect of CEO characteristics on capability, power and relationship dimensions. The results indicate that, to begin with, the diversity of TMT functional background exerts a negative effect on firm innovation performance. Besides, the richer CEO’s functional background is and the longer CEO’s tenure and that of TMT members overlaps, the negative effect of TMT functional background on firm innovation performance is weaker. Additionally, the more powerful CEO is, the negative effect is stronger. The paper adopts a dynamic theoretical construct instead of a stable one which is conducive to unfold the “blackbox” of “group diversity—firm outcome”. Besides, the findings are helpful for those firms which urge to improve firm innovation.