科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 1537-1544.
• 科学学理论与方法 • 下一篇
陈靖,洪伟
收稿日期:
修回日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
通讯作者:
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
摘要: 实验主义治理在欧洲国家的治理体系中扮演着日益重要的角色,有学者因此呼吁全球治理走向实验主义治理。中国在经济、政治、环境保护、人口控制等领域广泛实施了试点项目,这种特有的试点是否能被视为实验主义治理呢?本文先梳理了中国试点与欧盟实验主义治理的历史,厘清了两者的差异性,并从试验与实验机制的异同性、制度背景的差异、以及中国试点实施路径的多样性和实验主义治理特有的同行评议制度的不同,指出中国试点不属于实验主义治理,中国应对当前环境、能源等社会问题的治理方式是平行于实验主义治理的另一种新模式。
Abstract: Experimentalist governance plays an important role in the governance system of Europe. Some scholars call for a global initiative to move towards experimentalist governance. China has implemented various pilot projects during the course of economic reform, political reform, environmental protection, population control, etc. Can China's unique pilot projects be categorized into experimentalist governance? This paper clarifies the differences in their mechanisms and institutional background. The unique peer review system of experimentalist governance is also very different from the widely diversified paths in China's pilot implementation. Therefore, China's pilot project cannot be regarded as experimentalist governance. Actually, China's governance to deal with some current social problems, such as air pollution and energy sustainability, is a new model that is parallel to experimentalist governance.
陈靖 洪伟. 试验还是实验?试点与实验主义治理的比较[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(9): 1537-1544.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://journal08.magtechjournal.com/kxxyj/CN/
https://journal08.magtechjournal.com/kxxyj/CN/Y2020/V38/I9/1537