学术合作网络与研究影响———基于我国高校科学家的微观证据

科学学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 777-785.

学术合作网络与研究影响———基于我国高校科学家的微观证据

解峰¹,¹,陈轩瑾²,窦天芳¹,³

1.
2. 西南交通大学经济管理学院
3. 清华大学图书馆

收稿日期:2020-05-14 修回日期:2020-07-23 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-06-03
通讯作者: 陈轩瑾
基金资助:
清华大学自主科研计划文科振兴基金基础研究专项;国家自然科学基金面上项目

Publication Collaboration and Research Impact: Evidence from Universities in China

Received:2020-05-14 Revised:2020-07-23 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-06-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文从社会资本理论出发，以清华大学8个工科院系为对象，研究了社会资本是如何影响学术产出成果以及不同社会资本维度之间的相互关系。研究结果表明：社会资本的结构性维度对于学术成果产出具有正向的促进作用，由于学科特征差异，关系性维度和认知性维度对于学术成果的正向影响在部分院系显著。关系性维度和认知性维度在一定程度上对结构性维度有着正向的显著影响，从而帮助科学家获得有利的网络位置。

Abstract: Based on eight engineering departments in Tsinghua University, this paper tries to investigate how social capital affect the research output and the associations between different dimensions of social capital. The results indicate scientists with higher structural dimensions in co-authorship networks have higher citation count. Due to discipline differentiation, relational capital and cognitive capital are positively related to citation count in some departments. The associations between relational, cognitive capital and structural capital are positive to some extent, which may help scientists to obtain advantage positions in co-authorship network.

解峰陈轩瑾窦天芳. 学术合作网络与研究影响———基于我国高校科学家的微观证据[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(5): 777-785.

参考文献

[1]张明妍.从科技论文看我国科研产出质量 [J]. 今日科苑, 2018, (5): 11-13.[J].今日科苑, 2018, 1(5):59-67 [2]Wuchty S, Jones B F, Uzzi B.The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J].Science, 2007, 316(5827):1036-1039 [3]Gazni A, Didegah F.Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications[J].Scientometrics, 2011, 87(2):251-265 [4]Lin N.Social networks and status attainment[J].Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, 25(1):467-487 [5]Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S.Social capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage[J].Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2):242-266 [6]彭灿, 李金蹊.团队外部社会资本对团队学习能力的影响——以企业研发团队为样本的实证研究[J].科学学研究, 2011, 29(9):1374-1388 [7]刘艳.高校社会资本影响组织创新, 办学绩效的实证研究[J].科研管理, 2010, 31: 134-146.[J].科研管理, 2010, 31(1):134-146 [8]朱慧, 周根贵.社会资本促进了组织创新吗?——一项基于分析的研究[J].科学学研究, 2013, 31(11):1717-1725 [9]唐朝永, 陈万明, 彭灿.社会资本, 失败学习与科研团队创新绩效[J].科学学研究, 2014, 32(7):1096-1105 [10]Putnam R D.Tuning in,tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America[J].PS: Political science & politics, 1995, 28(4):664-683 [11]Li E Y, Liao C H, Yen H R.Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective[J].Research Policy, 2013, 42(9):1515-1530 [12]Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y.Matthew: Effect or fable?[J].Management Science, 2013, 60(1):92-109 [13]DiMaggio P J, Powell W W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983: 147-160.[J].American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2):147-160 [14]梁文艳, 周晔馨, 于洪霞.社会资本与大学教师学术创新能力研究[J]. 经济研究, 2019, (11): 10.[J].经济研究, 2019, 11(10):133-148 [15]Potosky D.A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness,computer knowledge,and performance during training[J].Computers in Human behavior, 2002, 18(3):241-255 [16]Huang C-C, Lin T-C, Lin K-J.Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): Integrating the social capital and social cognition theories[J].Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2009, 8(3):160-169 [17]刘俊婉, 丁凯悦, 王菲菲.科学合作的弱关系, 强关系以及超级关系研究[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(4):500-510 [18]陈轩瑾, 解峰, 窦天芳.替代效应还是互补效应?——商业化知识生产对学术知识生产的影响[J].技术经济, 2018, 37(10):91-97 [19]戴勇, 朱桂龙, 肖丁丁.内部社会资本, 知识流动与创新——基于省级技术中心企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究, 2011, 29(7):1046-1055