技术接近性对国际技术合作影响———基于“一带一路”国家专利合作的研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 摘要：本文旨在研究技术合作驱动原因，并在探索其在国家层面上的影响因素。提出技术接近性对国际技术合作的影响假设，运用接近性分析方法，考虑社会接近性和地理距离等其他因素，以“一带一路”合作专利数据为研究对象，运用社会网络分析中的二次指派程序（QAP）方法。研究表明：国家之间技术接近性与技术合作呈倒U型关系，社会接近性与地理距离对合作具有调节作用。意味着过高或过低的技术领域组合的同质化都不利于提高技术合作绩效，同时国家间地理距离减缓了技术接近性对国际技术合作效应的影响。本研究对国际技术合作开展与筹划提供参考。

Abstract: Abstract: the purpose of this paper is to research the driving factors of technical cooperation and to explore its influence factors at the national level. Assume the influence of technological proximity on the existence of international technical cooperation, using proximity analysis method, considering the moderator variables of social proximity and geographic distance, with patent cooperation data between the belt and road countries, using social network analysis of quadratic assignment problem (QAP) method. Research has shown that technological proximity with the international technology cooperation between the belt and road countries is inverted u-shaped relationship, social proximity and geographic distance adjust the impact. Result means too high or too low technology combination of homogeneity was unfavorable to increase technical cooperation performance, at the same time national geographic distance slow effect of technical proximity to the international technology cooperation. This study provides reference for the planning of international technical cooperation.

高珺余翔. 技术接近性对国际技术合作影响———基于“一带一路”国家专利合作的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(6): 1050-1057.

参考文献

[1] Beaver D D. Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future[J]. Scientometrics. 2001, 52(3): 365-377. [2] 曾婧婧，张阿城. 中国参与国际科技合作30年(1987-2016):论文合著与项目合作分析视角[J]. 科技进步与对策. 2018, 447(11): 7-15. [3] 刘岩，蔡虹，向希尧. 企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响——基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析[J]. 科研管理. 2015(5): 3-11. [4] 张雨辰. 国际科技交流合作绩效的影响因素——以基础研究领域为例[J]. 国际经济合作. 2019(3). [5] 陈琼娣，余翔. 国外在华发明专利格局与技术结构研究---基于1993～2007年国外在华发明专利数据的分析[J]. 情报杂志. 2009, 28(6): 24-29. [6] 邱永辉. 国际研发合作的地域广度、资源禀赋与技术创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理学报. 2015, 12(10): 1487. [7] 刘胜奇，朱东华，汪雪锋. 基于合作全球图的专利国际合作分析[J]. 科研管理. 2015, 36(03): 79-83. [8] 王黎萤，池仁勇. 专利合作网络研究前沿探析与展望[J]. 科学学研究. 2015, 033(1): 55-61, 145. [9] Nam Y B G A. Globalization of technology: Network analysis of global patents and trademarks[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2011, 78(8): 1471-1485. [10] Boschma R. Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment[J]. Regional Studies. 2005, 39(1): 61-74. [11] Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K. Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics[J]. Regional Studies. 2015, 49(6): 907-920. [12] G. K J O L. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2006, 8(2): 71-89. [13] Plunket A. Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox[J]. Annals of Regional Science. 2014, 53(2): 395-422. [14] 向希尧，裴云龙. 基于情境的多维接近性与知识流动[J]. 管理学报. 2017, 014(4): 554-560. [15] Marrocu E, Paci R, Usai S. Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy?[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2013, 80(8): 1484-1498. [16] Crescenzi R, Nathan M, Rodriguez-Pose A. Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation[J]. Research Policy. 2016, 45(1): 177-194. [17] Ben Letaifa S, Rabeau Y. Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2013, 66(10): 2071-2078. [18] Gui Qinchang L C L D. International Knowledge Flows and the Role of Proximity[J]. Growth & Change. 2018. [19] 向希尧，裴云龙. 跨国专利合作网络中技术接近性的调节作用研究[J]. 管理科学., 28(1): 111-121. [20] Guan J C, Yan Y. Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy field[J]. Research Policy. 2016, 45(7): 1460-1473. [21] Sun Y, Grimes S. The actors and relations in evolving networks: The determinants of interregional technology transaction in China[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2017, 125(dec.): 125-136. [22] 许冠南，潘美娟，周源. 基于QAP分析的国际知识流动影响要素研究——以光伏产业为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理. 2016(10): 62. [23] Fagerberg J. A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ[J]. Research Policy. 1987, 16(2-4): 87-99. [24] 张晓黎，陆新华. 技术相似关系对技术创新绩效的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策. 2016, 33(18): 28-34. [25] Huang H, Su H. The innovative fulcrums of technological interdisciplinarity: An analysis of technology fields in patents[J]. Technovation. 2018, 84-85: 59-70. [26] Zeng J, Wu W, Liu Y, et al. The local variations in regional technological evolution: Evidence from the rise of transmission and digital information technology in China's technology space, 1992–2016[J]. Applied Geography. 2019, 112. [27] 邹艳，杨乃定，韦铁，等. 组织学习对企业合作创新知识转移的影响研究——协调机制的中介作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理. 2009(2): 98-102. [28] 杨博旭，王玉荣，李兴光. 多维邻近与合作创新[J]. 科学学研究. 2019, 37(01): 156-166. [29] Vrande V V D. RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES BALANCING YOUR TECHNOLOGY-SOURCING PORTFOLIO: HOW SOURCING MODE DIVERSITY ENHANCES INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2013, 34(5): 610-621. [30] Maskell P M A. The competitiveness of firms and regions. ‘Ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies. 1999, 6(1): 9-25. [31] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology. 1985, 91(3): 481-510. [32] Miguelez E. Collaborative patents and the mobility of knowledge workers[J]. Technovation. 2019, 86-87(8): 62-74. [33] 向希尧，裴云龙. 基于情境的多维接近性与知识流动%Multi-Dimensional Proximity and Knowledge Flows: A Context-Based Theoretical Frame[J]. 管理学报. 2017, 014(4): 554-560. [34] Capaldo A, Petruzzelli A M. Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge-Creating Alliances[J]. European Management Review. 2014, 11(1): 63-84. [35] Ben Letaifa S, Rabeau Y. Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2013, 66(10): 2071-2078. [36] Mancusi M L. International Spillovers And Absorptive Capacity: A Cross-country Cross-sector Analysis Based On Patents And Citations[J]. Journal of International Economics. 2008, 76(2): 155-165. [37] Dominique, Guellec, And, et al. The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data[J]. 2001. [38] Jing S, Chen C F, Cheng J, et al. Are China's solar PV products competitive in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative?[J]. Energy Policy. 2018, 120: 559-568. [39] Cassi L, Plunket A. Research Collaboration in Co-inventor Networks: Combining Closure, Bridging and Proximities[J]. Regional Studies. 2015, 49(6): 936-954. [40] Guan J, Ying H. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages[J]. Scientometrics. 2007, 72(3): 403-425. [41] Finardi U. Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: the case of nanotechnologies[J]. Scientometrics. 2011, 89(1): 37-50. [42] 张旭，佟贺丰，傅俊英. 基于事实型数据的科技评价与预测方法研究:以DNA测序技术为例[J]. 情报学报. 2011, 30(9): 911-915. [43] 许培源，吴贵华. 粤港澳大湾区知识创新网络的空间演化_兼论深圳科技创新中心地位[J]. 中国软科学. 2019(5): 68-79. [44] 刘军. 整体网分析（第二版）[M]. 1. 上海: 格致出版社, 2018. [45] 刘军. QAP:测量“关系”之间关系的一种方法[J]. 社会. 2007(04): 164-174. [46] Suna Y, Grimes S. The actors and relations in evolving networks: The determinants of inter- regional technology transaction in China[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2017: 125-136. [47] Lee W J, Lee W K, Sohn S Y. Patent Network Analysis and Quadratic Assignment Procedures to Identify the Convergence of Robot Technologies[J]. PLOS ONE. 2016, 11(10): e165091. [48] Buffa F, Beritelli P, Martini U. Project networks and the reputation network in a community destination: Proof of the missing link[J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2019, 11: 251-259. [49] Baird T. Who speaks for the European border security industry? A network analysis[J]. European Security. 2017, 26(1 ): 37-58. [50] 许冠南，胡伟婕，周源，等. 全球新兴制造网络知识流动影响要素及演化[J]. 科学学研究. 2019. [51] 张国峥，赵嵩正，王娟茹. 隐性知识与知识集成:知识吸收的中介作用与激励的调节作用[J]. 情报理论与实践. 2015(06). [52] Alnuaimi T, Opsahl T, George G. Innovating in the periphery: The impact of local and foreign inventor mobility on the value of Indian patents[J]. Research Policy. 2012, 41(9): 1534-1543.