• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1537-1545.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

谁会成为学术不端的“吹哨人”———举报影响因素分析

赵延东1,张琦2   

  1. 1. 中国人民大学
    2. 中国人民大学社会与人口学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-18 修回日期:2021-03-24 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 赵延东

  • Received:2020-09-18 Revised:2021-03-24 Online:2021-09-15 Published:2021-09-15

摘要: 科学共同体成员内部举报是发现学术不端行为线索的重要信息来源。研究根据2017年对北京市科技工作者抽样社会调查所得数据的分析,统计了科技工作者中举报学术不端行为者所占比例,并从个体、组织和文化三个层面探讨了影响举报行为的因素。结果发现,有9.4%的科技工作者在知晓学术不端行为后选择举报,个人对学术不端行为的感知、自我效能和信仰、担任行政职务、所在单位类型及单位的学术氛围与管理水平、受西方科研文化影响程度等均对个人举报行为有较为明显的影响。最后根据调查分析结果提出了完善学术不端举报制度的政策建议。

Abstract: Whistleblowing from the member of scientific community is the main information source of the governance of scientific misconduct. Based on the survey data of scientific personnel in Beijing in 2017, the paper describe the ratio of whistleblowers in the scientific personnel, and distinguished factors influencing whistleblowing behavior. The findings show that 9.4% of scientific personnel blow the whistle when they found people around them committed scientific misconduct. Factors including perception of scientific misconduct, self-efficacy, religion belief, administrator position, type of organization and organizational environment, and the impact of scientific culture are distinguished as having prominent impact on the propensity of whistleblowing. Policy suggestions to encourage whistleblowing of scientific misconduct are proposed in the end of the paper.