创新型城市试点政策与城市产学研知识流动———基于长三角城市群的空间DID 模型分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章使用2004-2018年长三角城市群24个城市的面板数据，基于双元性视角采用超效率DEA模型分别测度了产学研知识研发效率和知识转化效率，并基于空间DID模型研究创新型城市试点政策对长三角城市群产学研知识流动效率的影响机制。结果显示：（1）长三角城市群的产学研知识研发效率均值整体高于知识转化效率均值；（2）创新型城市试点对城市产学研知识研发效率和知识转化效率的政策效应均表现为促进作用；（3）城市创新氛围在创新型城市试点政策对产学研知识研发效率和知识转化效率的影响机制中均发挥了部分中介效应；（4）使用动态网络DEA模型重新测度城市产学研知识流动效率并再次进行空间DID模型回归，其结果验证了主回归结果的稳健性。

Abstract: Based on the innovation value chain theory, this paper divides the efficiency of urban industry-university-research knowledge flow into knowledge research efficiency and knowledge transformation efficiency. The super-efficiency DEA model is used to measure the efficiency of industry-university-research knowledge research and knowledge transformation in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. On the basis of the spatial DID model to study the impact mechanism of innovative city pilot policy on the efficiency of urban industry-university-research knowledge flow and the mediating effect of urban innovation atmosphere, the dynamic network DEA model is used to re-measure the efficiency of urban industry-university-research knowledge flow, and the regression results are tested for robustness. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) Generally speaking, the average value of knowledge research efficiency of industry-university-research in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration is higher than knowledge transformation efficiency, and there is spatial heterogeneity in both. And the distribution characteristics of the regions are different. (2) The policy effect of innovative city pilots on the efficiency of urban industry-university-research knowledge flow is promoted, and there is a positive spatial spillover effect between neighboring cities. (3) The innovative city pilot policy has a significant positive impact on the urban innovation atmosphere, and urban innovation atmosphere plays a partial mediating effect in the influence mechanism of innovative city pilot policy on the efficiency of urban industry-university-research knowledge research and the efficiency of knowledge transformation. (4) The results of industry-university-research knowledge research efficiency and knowledge transformation efficiency measured by the dynamic network DEA model are basically consistent with the above, and on this basis, the regression results of the spatial DID model also verify the robustness of the main regression results. Based on the research conclusions, this article proposes the following policy implications. First, the current Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration should pay more attention to the transformation process of knowledge achievements when constructing and improving the industry-university-research cooperative innovation mechanism. At the same time, in the integration process of the Yangtze River Delta, the government should promote the overall innovation and development of three provinces and one city, especially to guide and drive the construction of an urban industry-university-research collaborative innovation mechanism in Anhui Province, promote the efficiency of its industry-university-research knowledge flow, and further improve the innovation system of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations. Second, in the process of implementing pilot policy for innovative cities, local governments should focus on the industry-university-research collaborative innovation, and establish an innovation mechanism involving multi-party of government- industry-university-research. In addition, the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration should also concentrate on promoting the development of regional linkages, and actively leverage the synergy of urban innovation. Third, local governments should promote the formation of a positive urban innovation atmosphere in the process of implementing innovative city pilot policy, starting from the three aspects of providing innovation policy support, promoting innovation platform construction, and improving innovation development capabilities. Through this way, the efficiency of urban industry-university-research knowledge flow can be improved.

王晓红张少鹏张奔. 创新型城市试点政策与城市产学研知识流动———基于长三角城市群的空间DID 模型分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(9): 1671-1682.

参考文献

[1] 陈子韬,孟凡蓉,王焕.科技人力资源对科技创新绩效的影响:基于企业和高校机构的比较[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(09): 173-180. [2] 陈红春,龙治坚,胡尚连,等.校企合作下高校创新创业实践基地的建设与探索[J].实验技术与管理,2019,36(04): 242-244. [3] 张新刚.校企科研合作项目管理模式创新[J].中国高校科技,2017(07): 69-70. [4] 王晓红,张奔.校企合作与高校科研绩效:高校类型的调节作用[J].科研管理,2018,39(02): 135-142. [5] 王晓红,张少鹏,张奔.校企知识流动效率测度及影响因素分析——基于空间面板Tobit模型的实证研究[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-9[2020-08-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20200702.1101.028.html. [6] Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W. and Zawislak, P. A. New perspectives on university-industry relations: An analysis of the knowledge flow within two sectors and two countries[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2019,31(5): 1314-1326. [7] 刘红光,刘科伟,张继飞.国外推进自主创新的政策模式及其对我国建设创新型城市的启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(11): 16-21. [8] 符新伟,段婕,白海林.产学研合作对创新型城市建设影响力的实证研究——以西安市为例[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(21): 49-56. [9] 王保乾,罗伟峰.国家创新型城市创新绩效评估——以长三角地区为例[J].城市问题,2018(01): 34-40. [10] 王默,魏先彪,彭小宝,等.国家创新型城市效率评价研究——基于两阶段DEA模型[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(06): 65-74. [11] 武倩,冯涛.国家创新型城市建设的生产率效应[J].现代经济探讨,2020(01):79-84. [12] Ke, X., Chen, H. Q. and Hong, Y. M., et al. Do China’s high-speed-rail projects promote local economy? New evidence from a panel data approach[J]. China Economic Review, 2017,44(7): 203-226. [13] 梁琦,李建成,夏添,徐世长.知识交流合作的空间溢出与邻近效应——来自长三角城市群的经验证据[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2019,59(02): 41-51+219-220. [14] 李政,杨思莹.创新型城市试点提升城市创新水平了吗?[J].经济学动态,2019(08): 70-85. [15] 白俊红,卞元超.政府支持是否促进了产学研协同创新[J].统计研究,2015,32(11): 43-50. [16] 李政,杨思莹.财政分权体制下的城市创新水平提升——基于时空异质性的分析[J].产业经济研究,2018(06): 50-61. [17] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51(04): 60-73. [18] 张宝生,王晓红.虚拟科技创新团队知识流动意愿影响因素实证研究——基于知识网络分析框架[J].研究与发展管理, 2012,24(02): 1-9+57+126. [19] 范德成,李盛楠.考虑空间效应的高技术产业技术创新效率研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36(05): 901-912. [20] 王栋,赵志宏.金融科技发展对区域创新绩效的作用研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(01): 45-56. [21] Ojha, D., Acharya, C. H. and Cooper, D. Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018,197(5): 215-231. [22] Zhang, B. and Wang, X. Empirical study on influence of university-industry collaboration on research performance and moderating effect of social capital: evidence from engineering academics in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,113(4): 1-21. [23] Gualandris, J., Legenvre, H. and Kalchschmidt, M. Exploration and exploitation within supply networks: Examining purchasing ambidexterity and its multiple performance implications[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2018(3): 667-689. [24] 陈元志,陈劲,吉超.中国不同类型企业技术创新效率的趋势与比较[J].科研管理,2018,39(05): 1-10. [25] 王晓珍,蒋子浩.我国高校创新效率及环境分析:价值类型视角[J].科研管理,2019,40(10): 25-36. [26] 吴卫红,杨婷,张爱美.高校创新要素集聚对区域创新效率的溢出效应[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(11): 46-51. [27] 赵晓萍,刘隽,古天龙,等.“双一流”建设背景下地方高校内部院系三阶段DEA效率评价[J].数学的实践与认识,2019,49(14): 77-87. [28] Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. and Salgado, J. F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009,94(5): 1128-1145. [29] Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L. and Farr, J. L., et al. Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2011,5(1): 90-105. [30] Feng Y C, Wang X H and Du W C, et al. Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,235(2): 210-224. [31] 许治,陈丽玉.国家级创新型城市创新能力的动态演进——基于技术成就指数的研究[J].管理评论,2016,28(10): 58-66. [32] 范巧,吴丽娜.国家级新区对属地省份经济增长影响效应评估[J].城市问题,2018(04): 48-58. [33] 高翔.城市规模、人力资本与中国城市创新能力[J].社会科学,2015(03): 49-58. [34] 陈强,颜婷,刘笑.科技创新人力资源集聚对区域创新能力的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(11): 1722-1730. [35] Paskaleva, K. and Cooper, I. Open innovation evaluation for Internet-enabled services in smart cities[J]. Technovation, 2014,9(7): 871-887. [36] 张剑,吕丽,宋琦,等.国家战略引领下的我国创新型城市研究:模式、路径与评价[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(09): 49-56. [37] 孟庆玺,尹兴强,白俊.产业政策扶持激励了企业创新吗?——基于“五年规划”变更的自然实验[J].南方经济,2016(12): 1-25. [38] Fare, R. and Grosskopf, S. Network DEA[J]. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 2000,(34): 35-49. [39] Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach[J]. Omega, 2014,(42): 124-131. [40] 白雪洁,李爽.基于动态网络SBM模型的中国高技术产业创新效率[J].中国科技论坛,2016(05): 39-45. [41] 胡树华,喻信东,解佳龙,等.创新密集区创新创业环境评估研究[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(05): 10-12+38.