• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 278-287.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

新冠疫情应对决策中的研究证据使用:基于十个国家的定性比较分析

杨代福,刘爽   

  1. 重庆大学
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-30 修回日期:2021-06-03 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨代福
  • 基金资助:
    基于COVID-19全球大流行的公共危机循证政策制定研究

  • Received:2021-01-30 Revised:2021-06-03 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-15

摘要: 循证政策制定有助于提高政府决策的科学性和公共政策质量,尤其在公共危机状态下能够帮助决策者快速高效地做出决策。在当前的新冠疫情应对中,如何提升研究证据在决策中的使用已成为中外学界和实务界高度关注并亟待解决的问题。本文采用模糊集定性比较分析方法,以10个国家为研究样本,试图分析多重因素影响新冠疫情应对决策中研究证据使用的复杂因果机制。结果表明,各国新冠疫情应对决策中研究证据使用受到了多元复杂因素的影响,具有两条高研究证据使用的驱动路径和三条非高研究证据使用的驱动路径,决策者对研究证据的重视、足够的研究证据和良好的政治共识对各国新冠疫情应对决策中研究证据使用起着重要的促进作用。

Abstract: Evidence-based policy-making helps to improve the scientificity of government decision-making and the quality of public policy, especially in the state of public crisis. In the current Covid-19 response, how to improve the use of research evidence in decision-making has become a highly concerned and urgent problem for international academic and practical circles. Using the method of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, this paper attempts to analyze the complex causal mechanism of multiple factors affecting the use of research evidence in the Policy-making of Covid-19 Response. The results show that the use of research evidence in the Policy-making of Covid-19 Response is affected by multiple complex factors, with two driving paths of high research evidence use and four driving paths of non high research evidence use. The attitude of policy makers towards research evidence, the system of political party cooperation and consultation, and the amount of research evidence have great influence on Covid-19 plays an important role in promoting the use of research evidence in decision-making. On this basis, this paper discusses the strategies that can be taken to provide reference for promoting the use of research evidence in the Policy-making of Covid-19 Response.