• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 2281-2293.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

房价对企业创新的影响———基于创新投入与人才政策视角

何增华1,随淑敏2,王京雷2   

  1. 1. 重庆工商大学
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-26 修回日期:2022-01-26 出版日期:2022-12-15 发布日期:2022-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 何增华
  • 基金资助:
    我国中长期规划决策机制及方法论研究:基于五年规划实施绩效视角;合作治理视角下高水平建设西部(重庆)科学城的实现路径研究

The Effect of Housing Price on Enterprise Innovation——From the Perspective of Innovation Investment and Talent Policy

  • Received:2021-10-26 Revised:2022-01-26 Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-15

摘要: 通过对2008-2017年全国35个大中型城市商品房价格数据与中国A股上市公司发布的专利数据进行匹配,基于创新投入与人才政策视角,重新审视房价对企业创新数量与质量的影响及机制。研究发现,房价上涨对企业非发明专利授权量不存在明显影响,但却能显著促进其发明专利授权量和专利授权总量,在考虑遗漏变量、互为因果等内生性问题后,这一结论依然稳健。异质性分析结果表明,房价上涨显著促进了高新技术企业与非国有企业的创新产出;房价对一线城市企业创新具有一定的先促进后抑制的倒U型影响,对其他城市企业创新则具有一定的先抑制后促进的正U型影响。机制分析结果表明,房价上涨带来的成本效应并不会挤出企业对发明专利创新的研发投入,反而房价带来的成本上涨迫使企业增加核心技术创新投入以继续保持较高的市场竞争力;人才政策强化了非一线城市房价对企业创新的促进作用,但该调节效应在一线城市并不显著。据此,提出相关对策建议。

Abstract: By matching the commodity housing price data of 35 large and medium-sized cities in China with the patent data released by China’s A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2017, the article re-examines the effect and mechanism of housing price on the quantity and quality of enterprise innovation from the perspective of innovation investment and talent policy. The results show that the rise of housing prices has no significant effect on the number of non-invention patents granted by enterprises, but it can significantly promote the number of invention patents granted and the total number of patents granted. This conclusion is still robust after considering the endogenous problems such as omitted variables and mutual causation. The results of heterogeneity analysis show that the rise of housing prices significantly promotes the innovation output of high-tech enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises, but has no significant impact on the innovation output of non-high-tech enterprises and state-owned enterprises. And the housing price has an inverted U-shaped effect on enterprise innovation in the first-tier cities, while it has a positive U-shaped effect on enterprise innovation in other cities. The results of mechanism analysis show that the cost effect of rising housing price will not crowd out R&D investment for invention patent innovation but will make enterprises increase core technology innovation investment to maintain high market competitiveness. Furthermore, the talent policy strengthens the promoting effect of housing price on enterprise innovation in non-first-tier cities, but the moderating effect is not significant in first-tier cities. Based on above results, the following countermeasures and suggestions are put forward: First, we should focus on the positive role of housing price in promoting the quality of enterprise innovation. Second, we should correctly deal with the challenges and opportunities brought by rising housing prices to enterprise innovation. Third, the government should take differentiated measures to improve the innovation output of various types of subjects and different cities. Fourth, Fourth, we should strengthen the scientific formulation and effective implementation of talent policy, and give full play to the positive regulating role of talent policy in the relationship between housing price and enterprise innovation.