Abstract: Empowering scientific researchers the ownership or long-term use right of job-related technological achievements to implement property right incentive plays an important role in enhancing the innovation and entrepreneurship motivation of researchers and improving the transformation efficiency of technological achievements. However, the transformation of technological achievements after empowerment still faces many obstacles, which leads the enthusiasm of researchers and the transformation efficiency of technological achievements is still not high. Based on the reviewing the current situation of the implementation of the empowerment policy on job-related technological achievements, this paper analyzes the policy and transfer difficulties faced by the transformation of job-related technological achievements of scientific researchers after empowerment. It is found that scientific researchers still face the following problems after the implementation of the empowerment policy on job-related technological achievements. First, the top-level design conflict of the policy system. Due to the attribute of state-owned assets of job-related technological achievements, there are policy conflicts in terms of property right ownership, value evaluation and so on. At the same time, the policy system of technological achievement transformation has the problem of poor convergence between top-level design and subdivision policies, which directly affects the effectiveness of policy implementation. Second, cumbersome transfer and transformation approval procedures. Excessive approval procedures and long approval process of state-owned asset management hinder the technological achievement transformation; Third, Job-related technological achievements have the problems of high evaluation complexity, poor evaluation quality and high evaluation cost, scientific researchers' dual "risk anxiety" about the loss of state-owned assets and the occupation of state-owned assets. Fourth, difficulty of realizing transformation income. As it is difficult to evaluate the value of scientific and technological achievement, coupled with the constraints of maintaining and increasing the value of state-owned assets, scientific researchers have practical difficulties and concerns about "difficult to cash" and "afraid of accountability" for the benefits due to the achievements transformation. Fifth, insufficient motivation for achievement transformation. In the process of implementing the pilot policy, the interests of scientific researchers may be overemphasized, while the interests of achievement transformation institutions and talents in the marketization stage of scientific and technological achievements transformation may be ignored. Based on this, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions. First, strengthen the policy coordination mechanism. By optimizing the top-level design of science and technology policies to enhance policy synergies, perfecting the smooth connection of subject policies and supporting policies, and optimize the communication mechanism and coordination mechanism between relevant management departments of science and technology policies. Second, simplify the process of confirming the right of job-related technological achievements. Optimizing State Property Supervision and improving the independent right of universities and research institutes to transform achievements. Third, perfecting the evaluation and pricing mechanism of technological achievements. Optimizing the evaluation system of scientific and technological achievements, establishing the evaluation model of combining qualitative and quantitative analysis which is more in line with the growth law of scientific and technological achievements market, promoting the marketization of scientific and technological achievements evaluation, and strengthening capacity-building for assessment professionals. Fourth, improving the income guarantee mechanism. Clear the ownership share and income share of job-related technological achievements held by scientific researchers, and establish evaluation system related to the technological achievement transformation in R&D institutions, universities and state-owned enterprises to ensure the implementation of scientific researcher income. Fifth, improving the income distribution proportion of achievement transformation institutions and talents. Promote support willingness and service motivation of transformation institutions and talents by increasing the income distribution ratio.