创业孵化平台生态优势的量表开发与检验

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 905-915.

创业孵化平台生态优势的量表开发与检验

陈凌子¹,¹,周文辉²

1.
2. 中南大学商学院

收稿日期:2022-03-24 修回日期:2022-05-11 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-15
通讯作者: 周文辉
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大项目;国家自然科学基金面上项目;湖南省自然科学基金面上项目

Dimensions and measurement of ecological advantage of entrepreneurship incubation platforms

Received:2022-03-24 Revised:2022-05-11 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-15
Supported by:
“数字创新驱动的新企业创业模式研究”;“赋能型创业孵化平台价值共创: 动因、机制与路径”;“基于数字平台赋能的创业者与消费者价值共创研究”

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创业孵化平台通过协调平台参与者力量有效突破创业资源价值转换瓶颈，形成创业孵化平台生态优势。现有文献对生态优势研究还处于萌芽阶段，多以定性研究为主，缺乏测量工具。本研究基于理论与文献基础，运用探索性多案例研究方法，以5家创业孵化平台为研究对象，运用扎根理论提炼出创业孵化平台生态优势的内涵和维度，根据规范的量表开发程序编制初始测量量表，对369份有效问卷进行信效度检验。结果显示：创业孵化平台生态优势包括生态多样性、生态共生性和生态进化性三个维度，最终呈现的测量量表具有较高的信度和效度，为后续实证研究奠定了量表基础和测量工具。

Abstract: Abstract：Content?of?abstract?The platform-based entrepreneurship ecosystem is taking shape. On the one hand, leading enterprises are engaged in the construction of incubators and build entrepreneurship incubation platforms to promote transformation and upgrading and the development of new start-ups. On the other hand, new start-ups rely on entrepreneurship incubation platforms to start businesses and break through the double constraints of entrepreneurial resources and opportunities. Scholars usually use the competitive advantage to explain the ability of enterprises to occupy and maintain high performance. However, competitive advantage based on the supply side emphasizes internal value chain optimization, ignoring the value co-creation of ecological complementaries in the platform context, which makes it difficult to explain the interaction in the value network of entrepreneurship incubation platforms. The demand-based ecological advantage theory emphasizes mutual empowerment and value co-creation, which can effectively explain the process of achieving high performance of entrepreneurship incubation platforms. However, the current research on ecological advantage is still in its initial stage. Some scholars have explained the concept of ecological advantage, but the dimensions of the concept are still unclear. There is a lack of corresponding measurement scales, which limits the theoretical development and empirical testing of the subsequent research. The ecological advantage theory needs to be explored and improved by scholars. Based on this, this paper takes the entrepreneurship incubation platform as the research object and explores the ecological advantage of the entrepreneurship incubation platform and its measurement scale. Firstly, this paper compares the literature on entrepreneurship incubation platforms and ecological advantage systematically and conducts in-depth exploratory case studies on five entrepreneurship incubation platforms. Secondly, this paper explores the constitutive dimensions of ecological advantage of entrepreneurship incubation platforms, which are ecological diversity, ecological symbiosis, and ecological evolution, respectively, in the context of rooted theory and literature. Thirdly, this paper combines the results of existing studies and case studies to compile the scale measurement items and uses a large-scale questionnaire to empirically test the ecological advantage dimensions and measurement items of entrepreneurship incubation platforms. Finally, this paper refines a 3-dimensional and 10-item scale of ecological advantage of entrepreneurship incubation platform with good reliability and validity. The theoretical contributions of this paper are as follows：firstly，this study promotes the in-depth integration of ecological theory and competitive advantage; secondly, it clarifies the concept and dimensions of ecological advantage of entrepreneurship incubation platform. Finally, this paper provides an ecological advantage measurement tool.

陈凌子周文辉. 创业孵化平台生态优势的量表开发与检验[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(5): 905-915.

参考文献

[1] 科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心. 中国创业孵化发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2020. [2] 周文辉, 阙琴. 数字平台创业如何突破机会资源的双重约束？[J]. 科学学研究:1-16. [3] 廖建文, 崔之瑜. 企业优势矩阵：竞争VS生态[J]. 哈佛商业评论, 2016(7):111-118. [4] 陈凌子, 周文辉, 周依芳. 创业孵化平台价值共创、动态能力与生态优势[J]. 科研管理, 2021,42(12):10-18. [5] Amit R, Han X. Value Creation through Novel Resource Configurations in a Digitally Enabled World[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2017,11(3):228-242. [6] Li J, Chen L, Yi J, et al. Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019,50(1):1448-1463. [7] Jacobides M G, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018,39:2255-2276. [8] Ozalp H, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Disruption in Platform-Based Ecosystems[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2018,55(7):1203-1241. [9] Thomas L, Autio E, Gann D M. Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context[J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2014,28(2):198-219. [10] Pauwels C, Clarysse B, Wright M, et al. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator[J]. Technovation, 2016(50):13-24. [11] 周文辉, 何奇松. 创业孵化平台赋能对资源配置优化的影响——基于机制设计视角的案例研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021,33(01):162-174. [12] 张力, 刘新梅. 在孵企业基于孵化器“内网络”的成长依赖[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(09):103-110. [13] Nambisan S, Siegel D, Kenney M. On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018,12(3):354-368. [14] 李梦雅, 杨德林, 胡晓, 等. 内层网络情境下孵化平台如何实现资源联动？[J]. 管理世界, 2022,38(02):169-187. [15] 周文辉, 孙杰. 创业孵化平台数字化动态能力构建[J]. 科学学研究, 2020,38(11):2040-2047. [16] Williamson P J, De Meyer A. Ecosystem Advantage: How to Successfully Harness the Power of Partners[J]. California Management Review, 2012,55(1):24-46. [17] Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, et al. Does Platform Owner's Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence from Google Photos[J]. Information Systems Research, 2018,29(2):444-460. [18] Feng Z, Iansiti M. Entry into platform‐based markets[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(1):88-106. [19] Adner R K R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017,31(3):306-333. [20] Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2010. [21] Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publication, 1990. [22] Churchill G A. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979,16(1):64-73. [23] 蔡义茹, 蔡莉, 杨亚倩, 等. 创业生态系统的特性及评价指标体系——以2006—2015年中关村发展为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(06):133-142. [24] 杨震宁. 中国企业的开放式创新:制度环境,"竞合"关系与创新绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(02):139-160. [25] Steffen, Strese, Marcel, et al. Examining cross-functional coopetition as a driver of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2016(57):40-52. [26] 池毛毛, 刘姝君, 卢新元, 等. 共享住宿平台上房东持续参与意愿的影响机理研究：平台网络效应的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019,22(04):103-113. [27] Hitt L M, Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value[J]. MIS quarterly, 1996:121-142. [28] Fariborz, Damanpour, Shanthi, et al. The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2001,38(1):45-65. [29] 唐丽艳, 周建林, 王国红. 社会资本、在孵企业吸收能力和创新孵化绩效的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014,35(07):51-59. [30] Hair J F, Black W C, Babin B J, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective[M]. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 2010.