• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 950-960.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    

技术创新与中产阶层演变———基于CFPS 面板数据的公共与私营创新的异质性分析

游杰1,邵宜航2,3   

  1. 1. 厦门大学经济学院
    2.
    3. 上海对外经贸大学创新与发展研究中心,厦门大学经济学院
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-27 修回日期:2023-01-05 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 游杰
  • 基金资助:
    供给侧结构性改革视阈下的社会结构与经济增长研究

Technological Innovation and Middle-Class Evolution:The Analysis on Heterogenous Effects of Public and Private Innovation with CFPS data

  • Received:2022-08-27 Revised:2023-01-05 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-15

摘要: 本研究考察技术创新是否提升了我国的中产阶层规模及其影响路径。利用2010-2020中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据,从微观视角展开的研究发现,技术创新显著提高了中产阶层的规模;但国家创新体系中公共和私营两种不同主体的创新对中产阶层的演变则存在异质性影响;公共创新既提升了技能型中产的就业规模,也推动了非技能型中产就业规模的增长,可以“无偏地”扩大中产阶层;而私营创新虽然提升了技能型中产的就业规模,却可能对非技能型中产就业规模存在负向影响,将“有偏地”影响中产阶层。本研究显示了政府在创新体系中的关键作用,中国特色社会主义经济体制增强了技术创新对中产阶层扩张的正向效应,使得中产阶层规模随技术创新而增长。该研究为扩大我国中产阶层规模与推进共同富裕提供了有益思路。

Abstract: This paper examines whether technological innovation has improved the scale of China's middle class. Using the data of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2010 to 2020, this paper examines the heterogenous effects brought by different innovation paths. It is found that technological innovation has significantly increased the size of the middle class. However, public innovation and private innovation, have different impacts on the evolution of the middle class. Public innovation, which has no biased effect, increases the scale of both skilled and non-skilled middle class, while private innovation, which has a biased impact, improves the scale of skilled middle class rather than non-skilled middle class. This paper also shows China’s institutions has magnified the positive effect of technological innovation on the expansion of middle class, which proves the key role of the government in improving both innovation and common prosperity. This study provides a useful idea for expanding the scale of middle class and promoting common prosperity. Compared with the existing studies, the possible marginal contribution of this paper is mainly reflected in the following aspects: First, from the perspective of national innovation system, we compare and analyze the differential impact of public innovation and private innovation on the middle class. Second, we examine the internal heterogeneity of the middle class from different perspectives. Current literature mainly measures the middle class from the perspective of income, while this paper further divides the middle class into skilled middle class and non-skilled middle class from the dimension of occupation, and then discusses the differentiated impact of technological innovation on different middle class. Third, under the socialist economic system in China, the state-led innovation development strategy may strengthen the positive effect of technological innovation on the expansion of the middle class, and finally make the scale of the middle class grow with technological innovation. This paper makes an in-depth investigation about the feasible path of technological innovation to expand the scale of middle class and promote the common prosperity. The analysis shows that, in order to realize the effective growth of the middle class, we should pay attention to the key role of public innovation led by the government. The public sector and the private sector play different roles in creating, producing and disseminating innovation. In order to maximize the social benefits brought by innovation, the government and the private sector should build a mutually beneficial innovation system. In the field of technological innovation, the enterprise is undoubtedly the most important innovation subject, however, under the spontaneous operation of the market, the enterprise innovation may have a biased impact on the distribution of labor income, and it is difficult to achieve shared growth. Therefore, it is necessary to reasonably define the boundary of technological innovation between the government and the market, and construct forward-looking and overall strategic planning for innovation and development. While allowing the market to play a decisive role in resource allocation, the government should strengthen its support and leading role in technological innovation in the field of national economic and social development.