当今全球科研评价的二难困局及其挑战

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 980-988.

当今全球科研评价的二难困局及其挑战

沈楠¹,徐飞²

1. 安徽农业大学
2. 中国科学技术大学

收稿日期:2022-05-23 修回日期:2022-12-17 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-06-13
通讯作者: 徐飞
基金资助:
中国杰出科学家的管理问题研究

The Dilimma and Challenge Faced by Current Global Scientific Research Evaluation

Received:2022-05-23 Revised:2022-12-17 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文结合若干实证数据资料，对当前科研评价中以论文引用频次、期刊影响因子、ESI学科评价来判断科技水平高低导致的二难困境进行了系统性分析，论述了“量化评价”与“内涵评价”之间的内在矛盾，阐明了当今科研共同体需要努力正视并逐步解决这一困局的紧迫性和必要性。

沈楠徐飞. 当今全球科研评价的二难困局及其挑战[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(6): 980-988.

[1] E. Garfield. Citation Indexes for Science: a New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas[J]. Science, 1955, 122( 3159): 108-111. [2] J. E. Hirsch. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572. [3] L. Liang, et al. A rhythm indicator for science and the rhythm of Science[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3): 535–544. [4] B. Jin, et al. The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(6): 855-863. [5] D. Butler. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market[J]. Nature, 2008, 451(7174): 6. [6] 赵星, 高小强, 唐宇. SJR与影响因子、h指数的比较及SJR的扩展设想[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2009, 27(2): 80-84. [7] 周英博, 马景娣, 叶鹰. 国际基础科学核心期刊h指数实证研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2009, 27(2): 66-70. [8] 阎光才. 学术影响力评价的是非争议[J]. 教育研究, 2019 (6): 16-26. [9] Richard Van Noorden, Brendan Maher, Regina Nuzzo. The Top 100 Papers: Nature explores the most-cited research of all time[J]. Nature, 2014, 514, 550-553. [10] Michael Way, et al. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment[J]. Journal of Cell Science, 2013, 126(9): 1903-1904. [11] S. Nakamura. GaN Growth Using GaN Buffer Layer[J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1991, 30 L1705 [12] D Strickland, G Mourou. Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses[J]. Optics Communications, 1985, 55(6): 447-449. [13] Koichi Tanaka, et al. Protein and polymeranalysis up to m/z 100.000 by laser ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1988, 2(8): 151-153. [14] Miki Tsukada,Yoshinori Ohsumi. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. FEBS letters, 1993, 333(1-2): 169-174. [15] Yoshinori Ohsumi, et al. Apg1p, a novel protein kinase required for the autophagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J].Gene, 1997, 192(2): 245-250. [16] M. Wadman. NIH mulls rules for validating key results: US biomedical agency could enlist independent labs for verification[J]. Nature, 2013, 500, 14-16. [17] Chung-I Wu, et al. On the low reproducibility of cancer studies[J]. National Science Review, 2018, 5(5): 619-624. [18] Tasuku Honjo. 前任诺奖得主本庶佑谈科研：为什么一流成果往往很难在顶级期刊发表？[EB/OL] https://www.163.com/dy/article/GOFS6B5T0512Q5FP.html. (2021-11-10) [19] http://news.sohu.com/a/529766940_121124321.(2022-03-14) [20] D. Sarewitz. The pressure to publish pushes down quality[J]. Nature, 2016, 533, 147. [21] Johan S. G. Chua, James A. Evans. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2021, 118(41): 1-5. [22] J. M. Campanario. Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(2): 549–565. [23] J. Tregoning. How will you judge me if not by impact factor?[J]. Nature, 2018, 558, 345.