国内外科技人才研究领域合作网络及主题分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 人才是创新的第一资源。国内外以科技人才为对象的研究已经取得了一定成果，促进了相关领域发展。文章基于Web of Science数据库和中国知网数据库，运用文献计量、知识图谱和战略坐标分析等方法对2010至2021年国内外科技人才主题相关的文献进行了可视化分析和比较研究，以期探讨当前科技人才研究的特征与发展趋势，推动我国科技人才研究领域发展。研究发现，从论文数量来看，国外发表量持续上升，国内发表量保持平稳。从合作网络来看，国外学者合作紧密，形成了以高产学者为核心的合作网络。国内研究团队较为分散，学者间交流合作较少。从研究主题来看，国外同质化现象严重，新颖性和热点研究较少。国内研究主题比较丰富，新颖性和热点研究较多。从研究方法来看，国外已经开始积极地开展跨学科研究并运用人工智能和大数据技术进行前瞻研判，而国内仍然缺乏方法创新。

Abstract: Talents are the primary resource of science and technology innovation. Research on domestic and overseas scientific and technological talents has made some achievements and promoted the development of related fields. Based on the Web of Science and CNKI databases, this paper conducts a visual analysis and comparative study on the literature related to the topics of domestic and overseas scientific and technological talents from 2010 to 2021 by using the methods of bibliometrics, knowledge map and strategic diagram analysis in order to explore the characteristics and development trend of current scientific and technological talents research and further promote the development of scientific and technological talents research field in China. It is found that, in terms of the number of papers, the number of publications of overseas researchers keeps rising, while the number of publications of domestic researchers remains stable. In terms of cooperation network, foreign scholars cooperate in a rather close and tight manner, forming a cooperation network centered on key scholars; while domestic research teams appear rather scattered, which suggests less research exchanges and cooperation. In terms of research topics, the phenomenon of homogenization in the overseas scope is serious and appears less novelty and hot spots in the publications, while for domestic research papers, topics indicate a higher level of novelty and hot spots. In terms of research methods, overseas researchers have started to actively carry out interdisciplinary research and use artificial intelligence and big data technology to make forward-looking judgments, while domestic research methods still lack of innovation.

李欣哲鲁晓. 国内外科技人才研究领域合作网络及主题分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(9): 1570-1580.

参考文献

[1] 王艳, 樊立宏. 多头并举培养造就创新型科技人才——《国家中长期人才发展规划纲要(2010—2020年)》解读[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2010, 25(06): 573-578. [2] 习近平. 在中国科学院第二十次院士大会、中国工程院第十五次院士大会、中国科协第十次全国代表大会上的讲话[N]. 人民日报, 2021-05-29(002). [3] 褚君浩. 加快科技人才队伍建设[J]. 人才资源开发, 2021(22): 1. [4] 习近平. 深入实施新时代人才强国战略加快建设世界重要人才中心和创新高地. 求是, 2021: 4-15. [5] 李拓宇, 李飞, 陆国栋. 面向“中国制造2025”的工程科技人才培养质量提升路径探析[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2015(06): 17-23. [6] 裴玲玲. 科技人才集聚与高技术产业发展的互动关系[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(05): 813-824. [7] 梁伟年. 中国人才流动问题及对策研究[D]. 华中科技大学, 2004. [8] 盛楠, 孟凡祥, 姜滨, et al. 创新驱动战略下科技人才评价体系建设研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(S1): 602-606. [9] 习近平. 努力成为世界主要科学中心和创新高地. 求是, 2021: 4-11. [10] Merton R K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations[M]. University of Chicago press, 1973. [11] Merton R K, Merton R C. Social theory and social structure[M]. Simon and Schuster, 1968. [12] Cole S, Cole J R. Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science[J]. American sociological review, 1967: 377-390. [13] 陈凯华, 郭锐, 裴瑞敏. 我国科技人才政策十年发展与面向高水平科技自立自强的优化思路[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(05): 613-621. [14] Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. 111. Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1970. [15] Chu J S G, Evans J A. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(41). [16] Milojevic S. Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111: 3984 - 3989. [17] Rahmandad H, Vakili K. Explaining Heterogeneity in the Organization of Scientific Work[J]. Organization Science, 2019, 30(6): 1125-1145. [18] Walsh J P, Lee Y-N. The bureaucratization of science[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(8): 1584-1600. [19] Hagstrom W O. Traditional and modern forms of scientific teamwork[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1964, 9(3): 241-263. [20] Amabile T M, Conti R, Coon H, et al. Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(5): 1154-1184. [21] Wu L, Wang D, Evans J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382. [22] F F M, E S P. Careers of Young Scientists:Preferences,Prospects and Realities by Gender and Field.[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2001, 31(1). [23] Michelle S. Fortier R J V, And Frederic Guay. Academic Motivation and School PerformanceToward a Structural Model1.[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1995. [24] 中国工程院"创新人才"项目组. 走向创新——创新型工程科技人才培养研究[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2010(01): 1-19. [25] 刘云, 白旭, 杨芳娟, et al. 高被引科学家论文合作关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(S1): 328-336. [26] Sauermann H, Roach M. Scientific Workforce. Why pursue the postdoc path?[J]. Science, 2016, 352(6286): 663-4. [27] 闫昊, 赵兰香, 周建中. 导师身份与杰出科技人才成长：一项事件史研究[J]. 科学学研究: 1-14. [28] Fox M F. Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2016, 35(1): 131-150. [29] Hermanowicz J C. Scientists and Satisfaction[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2003, 33(1): 45-73. [30] 赵兰香, 王芳, 姚萌. 中国人才培养急需“双重转型”[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(05): 532-541. [31] 乌云其其格. 发达国家高科技人才培养、使用与引进政策述要[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2007(10): 122-127. [32] 瞿群臻, 王嘉吉, 唐梦雪, et al. 基于逻辑增长模型的科技人才成长规律及影响因素研究——以海洋领域科技人才为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(12): 157-164. [33] Lee Y-N, Walsh J P, Wang J. Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3): 684-697. [34] Cui H, Wu L, Evans J A. Aging Scientists and Slowed Advance[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04044, 2022. [35] Hill R, Yin Y, Stein C, et al. Adaptability and the Pivot Penalty in Science[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06476 [36] 季煦, 李雪蓉, 林晨, et al. 数字经济时代反垄断研究知识图谱与演化——基于文献计量方法[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(10): 12-21. [37] 范岱年. 科学社会学在中国大陆的兴起[J]. 科学与社会, 2015, 5(02): 46-54. [38] Jones B F. The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder?[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2009, 76(1): 283-317. [39] Katz J S, Martin B R. What is research collaboration?[J]. Research policy, 1997, 26(1): 1-18. [40] 丁雪辰, 柳卸林. 基于文献计量分析的国内外学术创业研究现状与热点趋势评析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(05): 22-41. [41] Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2000, 45(3): 425-455. [42] Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817. [43] Merton R K. The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered[J]. Science, 1968, 159(3810): 56-63. [44] Callon M, Courtial J-P, Turner W A, et al. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis[J]. Social Science Information, 1983, 22(2): 191-235. [45] Callon M, Law J, Rip A. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World[M]. London: Basingstoke，Macmillan, 1986. [46] 沈君, 王续琨, 陈悦, et al. 战略坐标视角下的专利技术主题分析——以第三代移动通信技术为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(11): 88-94. [47] 撒凯悦, 沈君. 世界经济研究领域前沿动态研究——基于2000年以来CNKI数据库的文献计量分析[J]. 经济学动态, 2015(06): 93-101. [48] Courtial J-P, Law J. A Co-Word Study of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1989, 19(2): 301-311. [49] Turner W, Rojouan F. Evaluating input/output relationships in a regional research network using co-word analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 22(1): 139-154. [50] Callon M, Courtial J P, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 22(1): 155-205. [51] Law J, Bauin S, Courtial J, et al. Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification[J]. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(3-4): 251-264. [52] Duque R B, Ynalvez M, Sooryamoorthy R, et al. Collaboration Paradox:Scientific Productivity, the Internet, and Problems of Research in Developing Areas[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2005, 35(5): 755-785. [53] Brostr?m A. Academic breeding grounds: Home department conditions and early career performance of academic researchers[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(7): 1647-1665. [54] Lambovska M, K Y. Motivation of Researchers to Publish in High-Quality Journals A Theoretical Framework [J]. temjournal, 2020. [55] Amabile E M, Cont R, Coon H, et al. Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014. [56] Dietz J S, Bozeman B. Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(3): 349-367. [57] Dimaggio P J, Powell W W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160. [58] Austin A E. Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career[J]. The Journal of Higher Education, 2002, 73(1): 94-122. [59] Hakan K, Münire E. Academic Motivation: Gender, Domain and Grade Differences[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 143: 708-715. [60] Leslie S J, Cimpian A, Meyer M, et al. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6219): 262-5. [61] Way S F, Larremore D B, Clauset A. Gender, Productivity, and Prestige in Computer Science Faculty Hiring Networks[C]. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2016: 1169–1179. [62] Stephens N M, Hamedani M G, Destin M. Closing the social-class achievement gap: a difference-education intervention improves first-generation students' academic performance and all students' college transition[J]. Psychol Sci, 2014, 25(4): 943-53. [63] Uriostegui M, Roy A L, Li-Grining C P. What Drives You? Black and Latinx Youth's Critical Consciousness, Motivations, and Academic and Career Activities[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2021, 50(1): 58-74. [64] Woodcock A, Hernandez P R, Schultz P W. Diversifying Science: Intervention Programs Moderate the Effect of Stereotype Threat on Motivation and Career Choice[J]. Soc Psychol Personal Sci, 2016, 7(2): 184-192. [65] 易继明. 知识产权强国建设的基本思路和主要任务[J]. 知识产权, 2021(10): 13-40. [66] 易继明. 中美关系背景下的国家知识产权战略[J]. 知识产权, 2020(09): 3-20. [67] 陈战光, 李广威, 梁田, et al. 研发投入、知识产权保护与企业创新质量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(10): 108-117. [68] 李慷, 黄辰. 我国科研人员工作满意度影响因素的实证分析——基于第四次全国科技工作者状况调查报告[J]. 科技导报, 2021, 39(10): 99-108. [69] 王国燕, 杨玉琴, 金心怡. 科学家参与科学传播：价值、关系与能力提升[J]. 科学学研究: 1-16. [70] 李正风, 朱洪启, 王京春. 新时期推进高层次科普人才培养的思考[J]. 科普研究, 2021, 16(04): 87-91+111. [71] 任嵘嵘, 杨帮兴, 郑念, et al. 中国科普人才政策25年以来的演变、趋势与展望[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(04): 139-150. [72] 袁梦飞, 周建中. 我国高层次科普人才培养的现状与建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(12): 1431-1439. [73] Hayter C S, Parker M A. Factors that influence the transition of university postdocs to non-academic scientific careers: An exploratory study[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(3): 556-570. [74] 刘云, 杨芳娟. 我国高端科技人才计划资助科研产出特征分析[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(S1): 610-622. [75] 段光, 白鹭. 中国科技人才计划体系的特点、问题与发展建议[J]. 科技导报, 2021, 39(15): 75-83. [76] Xu F, Wu L, Evans J. Flat teams drive scientific innovation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022, 119(23): e2200927119. [77] Foster J G, Rzhetsky A, Evans J A. Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015, 80(5): 875-908.