• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 1702-1715.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

研发政策组合对突破性与渐进性创新影响———基于异质性 R&D 投资的渠道分析

成力为,吴薇   

  1. 大连理工大学
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-22 修回日期:2023-02-06 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 成力为
  • 基金资助:
    非对称开放下产品质量提升的路径选择与研发政策组合研究——基于产品空间理论视角;大连理工大学基本科研业务费智库项目

The effects of R&D policy mix on breakthrough and incremental innovation: The role of heterogeneous R&D investment

  • Received:2022-07-22 Revised:2023-02-06 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-21
  • Contact: Liwei Cheng

摘要: 本文构建了一个研发政策组合、异质性R&D投资(研究性投资和试验开发性投资)对创新(突破性和渐进性创新)影响的理论模型,对模型求解发现研发政策组合影响企业创新的3个效应:壁垒效应、阻止效应和偷窃效应;接着,利用2011-2018年中国1194家沪深上市制造业企业数据实证检验研发政策组合对企业创新的影响得到:第一,政府R&D补贴对企业渐进性创新存在显著促进作用,而税收优惠对企业创新的影响都不显著,可能存在着异质性;第二,进一步研究发现,政府R&D补贴更有利于激励国有企业渐进性创新,而税收优惠对非国有企业渐进性创新的提升作用更强。相比非高科技企业,政府R&D补贴显著促进了高科技企业突破性和渐进性创新,而税收优惠对高科技企业和非高科技企业渐进性创新存在不显著的激励效应;第三,就补贴政策而言,政府R&D补贴能有效降低企业的研发成本,当壁垒效应起主导作用时,通过提高企业研究性投资进而促进突破性创新。当偷窃效应占主导地位时,能激励企业研究性投资,但由于不能够完全占有创新利润,从而促使企业选择渐进性创新。当阻止效应起主导作用时,能刺激企业试验开发性投资,进而促进企业渐进性创新;就税收政策而言,税收优惠能有效降低企业的进入成本,此时阻止效应更明显,能增加企业试验开发性投资从而促进渐进性创新。研究强调不同研发政策对突破性与渐进性创新的微观作用渠道不同,为未来研发政策组合设计及政策搭配提供了有价值的参考。

Abstract: This paper constructs a model of R&D policy mix, heterogeneity R&D (research and development) investment and innovation(breakthrough innovation and incremental innovation),and presents three effects of R&D policy mix affecting firm’s innovation choice:hurdle effect, entry deterring effect and stealing effect. Using the panel data of 1194 listed enterprises in China from 2011 to 2018,this paper assesses the extent to which R&D policy mix has contributed to enterprise innovation. Empirical estimates indicate that, First, R&D subsidy significantly promotes firm’s incremental innovation, while tax incentive has no significant impact on firm’s innovation. Second, there is significant heterogeneity in the policy effect:R&D subsidy significantly raises state-owned enterprise’s incremental innovation, while the effect of tax incentive on incremental innovation is stronger in non-state-owned enterprise. Compared with non-high-tech enterprises, R&D subsidy is more beneficial to high-tech enterprise’s both breakthrough and incremental innovation, while tax policy has no significant incentive effect on incremental innovation of high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises. Third, in terms of subsidy policy, when the hurdle effect dominates, R&D subsidy can effectively reduce the R&D cost of enterprises and promote breakthrough innovation by increasing firm’s research investment. When stealing effect is dominant, it can stimulate firm’s research investment, due to the innovation profit cannot be fully occupied, it urges enterprises to choose incremental innovation. If entry deterring effect dominates, it can stimulate firm’s development investment, and then promotes the incremental innovation. As for tax policy, it can effectively reduce the entry cost of enterprises, when tax incentive can promote incremental innovation by increasing firm’s development investment, entry deterring effect is more prominent. These results show that different R&D policy toolkit has several channels on breakthrough and incremental innovation, which provides reference for the government to identify innovation policy instrument combinations.