问题导向的基础研究与产业突破性创新

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 2062-2072.

问题导向的基础研究与产业突破性创新

柳卸林¹,杨培培²,常馨之³

1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院
2. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI
3. 中国科学院大学中丹学院

收稿日期:2022-10-31 修回日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-11-15
通讯作者: 杨培培
基金资助:
高新技术产业突破性创新的形成机制与模式研究

The layout of problem-oriented basic research and radical innovation

Received:2022-10-31 Revised:2022-11-28 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在全球竞争日益激烈的情形下，基础研究在国家发展和安全保障中的作用逐渐凸显。若不能加强基础研究能力，我国将面临越来越多制裁以及“卡脖子”技术的约束，突破性创新也会受到一定的限制。目前，相对于其他发达国家，尤其是美国来说，我国基础研究仍存在明显不足，包括基础研究整体投入不足、以企业为主的问题导向基础研究的经费占比低下、不同创新主体之间未能形成稳健的基础研究体系等。基于分析，本研究提出了对我国未来的基础研究和关键核心技术突破具有启示意义的对策和建议，包括平衡问题导向的基础研究与好奇心导向的基础研究，调动大企业的积极性，多元化基础研究主体，建立军民两用的基础研究专项基金，促进基础研究主体的联动以及培养和吸引基础研究人才等。

Abstract: Along with the increasingly fierce competition around the world, the role of basic research in nation’s development and security has become more prominent. If the capability of basic research cannot be improved, China would be constrained to more sanctions and bottleneck technologies, and the radical innovation would also be affected. Currently, China’s basic research is still underdeveloped compared with other developed countries, especially the United States, including insufficient investment in basic research, the low proportion of problem-oriented basic research investment that is mainly guided by enterprises, failure to form a robust basic research system among different innovative actors etc. Based on the analysis, this research puts forward enlightening suggestions for China’s basic research and radical innovation, including balancing problem-oriented and curiosity-oriented basic research, mobilizing large enterprises’ enthusiasm in basic research, diversifying basic research actors, establishing special fund for military and civil basic research, promoting the cooperation and linkage of different actors, and training and attracting talents for basic research.

柳卸林杨培培常馨之. 问题导向的基础研究与产业突破性创新[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(11): 2062-2072.

参考文献

[1] 柳卸林,何郁冰. 基础研究是中国产业核心技术创新的源泉 [J]. 中国软科学, 2011(04): 104-117. [2] Salter A J, Martin B R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(3): 509-532. [3] Bush V. Science, the endless frontier. National Science Foundation–EUA. Washington. 1945, Washington: National Science Foundation. [4] 黄卫. 加强我国面向世界科技强国的基础研究基本布局和若干思考 [J]. 中国软科学, 2017(08): 1-8. [5] Stokes D. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. 1997, Washington: Booking Institution Press. [6] 田华, 郑晓齐, 田中. 美国国防基础研究资助机制特点分析与启示 [J]. 中国软科学, 2007(09): 33-42. [7] Brainard J, Normile D. China rises to first place in one key metric of research impact [J]. Science, 2022, 377: 799. [8] Beesley L G. Science policy in changing times: are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition? [J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8): 1519-1531. [9] Chen K, Zhang C, Feng Z, Zhang Y, Ning L. Technology transfer systems and modes of national research institutes: evidence from the Chinese academy of sciences [J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(3): 104471. [10] Arora A Belenzon SPatacconi A. A theory of the US innovation ecosystem: evolution and the social value of diversity [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2019, 28(2): 289-307. [11] Mowery D C, Military R&D and innovation, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. 2010, Elsevier. p. 1219-1256. [12] Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A. The decline of science in corporate R&D [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(1): 3-32. [13] 刘云, 翟晓荣. 美国能源部国家实验室基础研究特征及启示 [J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(06): 1085-1095. [14] 马双, 陈凯华. 美国基础研究体系：主要特征与经验启示 [J]. 科学学研究: 1-19. [15] Czarnitzki D, Thorwarth S. Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(9): 1555-1564. [16] Toole A A. The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(1): 1-12. [17] Belenzon S, Schankerman M. Spreading the word: Geography, policy, and knowledge spillovers [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95(3): 884-903. [18] Bikard M, Marx M, Frictions in the flow of academic knowledge to industry: Evidence from simultaneous discoveries. 2015, Working Paper, London Business School, London, UK. [19] Rogers E M, Takegami S, Yin J. Lessons learned about technology transfer [J]. Technovation, 2001, 21(4): 253-261. [20] 马晓雷, 李正伟, 李平. 美国军方科研基金资助策略研究（2010—2020年） [J]. 国防科技, 2021, 42(03): 98-106. [21] Jung E-Y, Liu X. The different effects of basic research in enterprises on economic growth: Income-level quantile analysis [J]. Science and Public Policy, 2019, 46(4): 570-588. [22] 李红林, 孙喜杰, 曾国屏. 典型国家基础研究投入及其协调机制研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(06): 1174-1180. [23] Calderini M, Garrone P. Liberalisation, industry turmoil and the balance of R&D activities [J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2001, 13(2): 199-230. [24] 徐晓丹, 柳卸林. 大企业为什么要重视基础研究？ [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(09): 3-19. [25] 眭纪刚, 连燕华, 曲婉. 企业的内部基础研究与突破性创新 [J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(01): 141-148. [26] Gertner J. The idea factory: Bell Labs and the great age of American innovation. 2012, New York: Penguin. [27] 宋开强, 基础研究与军事技术创新的互动机制. 2014, 国防科学技术大学. [28] 陈柏强, 柏利, 徐艺函, 刘增猛. 美国国防创新小组对中国军民科技协同创新发展的启示 [J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(15): 67-73. [29] 王浩璋, 范炳健, 王磊. 美国防创新小组近期主要研究项目及成果应用影响 [J]. 军事文摘, 2022(11): 63-66. [30] Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L. Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research [J]. American Economic Review, 2021, 111(3): 871-98. [31] Mowery D C. Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution” [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2009, 18(1): 1-50. [32] 李子璇, 杨波. 中国科研人员的国际流动趋势研究 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(16): 25-34. [33] Dugan R E, Gabriel K J. ‘Special forces’ innovation: How DARPA attacks problems [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2013, 91(10): 74-84. [34] Bonvillian W. Power Play: The DARPA Model and US Energy Policy [J]. The American Interest, 2006, 2(2): 39-49. [35] Fuchs，Erica，Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance，Research Policy，2010， 39：1133–1147 [36] Drake N. Basic science finds corporate refuge [J]. Nature, 2014, 509(7498): 18-19. [37] Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L, Back to basics: why do firms invest in research? 2017, National Bureau of Economic Research. [38] Arrow K, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. 1962, Princeton University Press: Princeton. p. 609-626. [39] Coase R H. The lighthouse in economics [J]. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1974, 17(2): 357-376. [40] Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A, Suh J. The changing structure of American innovation: Some cautionary remarks for economic growth [J]. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2020, 20(1): 39-93. [41] Liu X, Schwaag Serger S, Tagscherer U, Chang A Y. Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap? [J]. Science and Public Policy, 2017, 44(5): 656-669. [42] Fu J, Frietsch R, Tagscherer U, Publication activity in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database in the context of Chinese science and technology policy from 1977 to 2012. 2013, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis. [43] 薛姝, 张明喜. 我国企业基础研究支出分析及建议 [J]. 科技中国, 2022(05): 1-4. [44] 杨洋, 王丹, 常燕, 朱伟. 提升大型国有企业定向基础研究意愿与能力的建议 [J]. 科技中国, 2022(06): 1-4.