• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1088-1097.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

创新联合体利益主体间的利益冲突及博弈研究

岳颖初1,霍国庆2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院
    2. 中国科学院大学
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-09 修回日期:2023-04-07 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 霍国庆

Research on the Interest Conflicts and Game between the Stakeholders of Innovation Consortium

  • Received:2023-01-09 Revised:2023-04-07 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-05-15

摘要: 创新联合体是我国落实创新驱动发展战略的重要举措,其利益主体的多元化及其利益诉求的复杂性导致各方在创新协作中不可避免地存在着利益冲突,增加了利益整合与平衡的难度,影响了创新联合体的发展。为此,本文应用冲突理论、博弈论等对创新联合体利益冲突的本质和机理进行分析,归纳提出了规则性利益冲突、关系性利益冲突、分配性利益冲突三类冲突,并根据多边讨价还价博弈理论、正态分布函数、Shapley值法等构建了创新联合体利益分配过程的数学模型,对该过程不同环节产生的各类利益冲突进行量化评估,进而选取典型案例从实践层面对上述理论模型进行实证检验,最后提出了有效均衡创新联合体各方利益关系的策略建议,主要包括建立有利于共同治理的有效治理结构、促进以增强互信为核心的创新文化建设以及强化基于动态管理的激励约束措施。

Abstract: Innovation Consortium is an important factor to build the national innovation system. However, the diversity of stakeholders and the complexity of their interest demands lead to inevitable conflicts of interest in innovation collaboration, thus increasing the difficulty of interest integration and equilibrium, and affects the development of the Innovation Consortium. Therefore, this paper applies conflict theory and game theory to analyze the essence and mechanism of the conflict of interest in the Innovation Consortium, summarizes and brings up three types of conflicts: rule-based interest conflicts, relational interest conflicts, and distributive interest conflicts. Then, using theoretical methods such as multilateral bargaining game theory, normal distribution function, Shapley value method to construct a mathematical model of the interest distribution process of the Innovation Consortium, quantitatively evaluates various conflicts of interest in different parts of the process, and opting for a typical case to testify to the theoretical analysis. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to balance the interests of all parties in the Innovation Consortium, including establishing an effective governance structure conducive to joint governance, promoting the construction of the culture of innovation, which has a core of enhancing mutual trust, as well as strengthening incentive and constraint measures based on dynamic management.