[1] 胡蓓, 周均旭, 翁清雄. 高科技产业集群特性对人才吸引力的影响——基于武汉光谷、北京中关村等产业集群的实证 [J]. 研究与发展管理, 2009, 21(1): 51-57+78.
[2] 藏媛, 郝枫. 空气质量对流动人口城市留居意愿强度的影响 [J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(8): 91-99.
[3] 孙健, 尤雯. 人才集聚与产业集聚的互动关系研究 [J]. 管理世界, 2008, 3: 177-178.
[4] 孙文浩, 张益丰. 低房价有利于“抢人大战”城市科研人才集聚吗? [J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(5): 813-825.
[5] 王顺. 我国城市人才环境综合评价指标体系研究 [J]. 中国软科学, 2004, 3: 148-151.
[6] 吴耀国, 李双强, 杜江. 抢到人还是留住人:城市“抢人”政策的效果评估 [J]. 财经科学, 2020, 11: 94-107.
[7] 黄造玉, 徐晓新, 李升. 哪些因素对流动人口落户意愿的影响更大?——基于随机森林的变量重要性排序 [J]. 中国软科学, 2023, (4): 76-85.
[8] 郑代良, 钟书华. 中国高层次人才政策现状、问题与对策 [J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(9): 130-137.
[9] Adda J, Dustmann C, G?rlach J-S. The dynamics of return migration, human capital accumulation, and wage assimilation [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2022, 89(6): 2841-2871.
[10] 王腾, 关忠诚, 郑海军, 等. 全球顶尖科技人才流动的影响因素探析——基于扎根理论的分析 [J]. 科学学研究, 2023: 1-13.
[11] Craik K H. Environmental psychology [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1973, 24(1): 403-422.
[12] 覃大嘉, 徐恬恬, 贾侃, 等. 从职业视角探索个体居留意愿的形成:融合劳动观与阴阳和谐认知 [J]. 管理评论, 2023, (8): 232-243.
[13] 杨帆, 杜云晗. 创新与高端服务业人才集聚对经济增长影响的共轭效应研究——基于西部地区城市面板数据的分析 [J]. 中国软科学, 2021, (10): 82-91.
[14] 周丽群, 连慧君, 袁然. 国际劳动力流入对美国创新影响的实证分析——兼论对中国吸引国际人才的启示 [J]. 中国软科学, 2021, (6): 53-63.
[15] Zeithammer R, Kellogg R P. The hesitanthai gui: Return-migration preferences of u.S.-educated chinese scientists and engineers [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2013, 50(5): 644-663.
[16] 盛来运. 国外劳动力迁移理论的发展 [J]. 统计研究, 2005, (8): 72-73.
[17] 景晓芬. 老年流动人口空间分布及长期居留意愿研究——基于2015年全国流动人口动态监测数据 [J]. 人口与发展, 2019, 25(4): 34-43.
[18] Sarpong D, Maclean M, Harvey C. Relational interdependencies and the intra-eu mobility of african european citizens [J]. Human Relations, 2023.
[19] 刘旭阳, 金牛. 城市“抢人大战”政策再定位——聚焦青年流动人才的分析 [J]. 中国青年研究, 2019, 9: 47-53.
[20] Tams S, Kennedy J C, Arthur M B, et al. Careers in cities: An interdisciplinary space for advancing the contextual turn in career studies [J]. Human Relations, 2020, 74(5): 635-655.
[21] 原新, 刘旭阳, 赵玮. 青年流动人才城市选择的影响因素——基于不同规模城市的比较研究 [J]. 人口学刊, 2021, 43(2): 48-60.
[22] Ivankova N V, W C J, L S S. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice [J]. Field Methods, 2016, 18(1): 3-20.
[23] Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
[24] Johnson R B, Onwuegbuzie A J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come [J]. Educational Researcher, 2016, 33(7): 14-26.
[25] 王世权, 王向淑. 科技人才集聚的区域治理归因---基于多时段qca的组态分析 [J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(3): 492-502+540.
[26] 陈新明, 萧鸣政, 张睿超. 城市“抢人大战”的政策特征、效力测度及优化建议 [J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2020, 37(5): 59-69.
[27] Creswell J W, Clark V L P, Gutmann M, et al. Advanced mixed methods research designs [M]//TASHAKKORI A, TEDDLIE C. Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage. 2003: 209-240.
[28] 陈殿兵, 杨新晓. 混合研究设计的误区与澄清——一种教育学的视角 [J]. 现代教育科学, 2020, (01): 135-139+144.
[29] Gable G G. Integrating case study and survey research methods: An example in information systems [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1994, 3(2): 112-126.
[30] Inalhan G, Yang E, Weber C. Place attachment theory [M]. A handbook of theories on designing alignment between people and the office environment. Routledge. 2021: 181-194.
[31] 龙奋杰, 刘明. 城市吸引人口迁入的影响因素分析 [J]. 城市问题, 2006, 8: 44-46+53.
[32] Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, ?sth J. My home is my castle – assessment of city love in sweden [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 58.
[33] 陈英姿, 赵玉港, 胡亚琪. 社会融合视角下中国老年流动人口居留意愿的影响因素 [J]. 人口研究, 2022, 46(1): 97-112.
[34] 程燕林, 李晓轩, 宋邱惠. 高科技人才吸引和稳定的职场舒适物策略 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(10): 1803-1811.
[35] 倪渊, 张健. 科技人才激励政策感知、工作价值观与创新投入 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(4): 632-643.
[36] Lievens F, Van Hoye G, Schreurs B. Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context [J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 78(4): 553-572.
[37] 陈浩, 罗力菲. 财政能力、公共服务供给与流动人口居留意愿 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32(10): 197-208.
[38] 牛耕, 何雨可, 赵国昌. 城市品牌与流动人口居留意愿:来自“文明城市”评选的证据 [J]. 人口研究, 2022, 46(6): 117-130.
[39] 徐茜. 开放式创新下科技人才流动的知识与社会路径 [J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(8): 1397-1407.
[40] 张雪, 刘玉. 城市宜居性对流动人口居留意愿的影响 [J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(12): 20-28.
[41] 郭金花, 郭淑芬, 郭檬楠. 城市科技型人才集聚的时空特征及影响因素--基于285个城市的经验数据 [J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021, (6): 139-148.
[42] Diener E. Subjective well-being [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95(3): 542-575.
[43] Zheng X, Zhu W, Zhao H, et al. Employee well‐being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross‐cultural validation [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36(5): 621-644.
[44] 邹琼, 佐斌, 代涛涛. 工作幸福感:概念、测量水平与因果模型 [J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(4): 669-678.
[45] Cheng Z, Smyth R, Guo F. The impact of china’s new labour contract law on socioeconomic outcomes for migrant and urban workers [J]. Human Relations, 2014, 68(3): 329-352.
[46] Nielsen K, Nielsen M B, Ogbonnaya C, et al. Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Work & Stress, 2017, 31(2): 101-120.
[47] 程垦, 林英晖. 组织支持一致性与新生代员工离职意愿:员工幸福感的中介作用 [J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1570-1580.
[48] Russell J E A. Promoting subjective well-being at work [J]. Journal of Career Assessment, 2008, 16(1): 117-131.
[49] Johanson G A, Brooks G P. Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies [J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2009, 70(3): 394-400.
[50] Mobley W H, Horner S O, Hollingsworth A T. An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover [J]. Journal of Applied psychology, 1978, 63(4): 408.
[51] Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Podsakoff N P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2012, 63(1): 539-569.
[52] Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J]. J Appl Psychol, 2003, 88(5): 879-903.
[53] Guan J, Liu N. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological ?eld of nano-energy [J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 97-112. |