Abstract: This paper try to research two industrial clusters with different structures (homogeneous structure with no leading firms and heterogeneous structure with leading firms) and the comparative evolution of the respective clusters from three aspects of entry barriers, labor division levels and the innovation capacity. The research thus has the following conclusions: (1) compared with homogeneous structures, the heterogeneous structures’ scale is smaller, but the overall earnings will be higher when they become stable. (2)the heterogeneous structure clusters(those with leading firms) have higher labor division levels and more innovation capacity when compared with homogeneous structure clusters. (3) the research also finds that, with the appearance of leading firms and the increasing of entry barriers, entrepreneurship in the cluster may be suppressed(especially in new ventures), thus it would be harder than homogeneous structure clusters to develop new ventures, however, the welfare of the entire cluster would increase. It thus indicates that the development of leading firms will have complex effects on the clusters.

摘要： 论文分别从进入壁垒、分工水平以及集群创新等三个方面比较地研究了两个具有不同结构（同质性无核结构和异质性有核结构）产业集群的演化成长过程，结果发现：（1）相比同质性模型，具有核心企业的异质性产业集群在达到演化稳态的情况下规模更小，但总体收益更高，且具有更强的稳健性；（2）异质性结构的产业集群相比起同质性结构的产业集群有更高的分工水平和创新能力；（3）研究还发现核心企业的出现以及进入壁垒的升高，提高了整个集群的福利水平，但却抑制了集群的企业家精神（新创企业的创业家精神），从而很难像同质性集群那样更容易地出现新创企业，这一点也表明核心企业成长对集群的影响可能是非常复杂的。