Studies in Science of Science ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 45-53.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the evolution of environmental regulation policy in science and technology fields——Policy changes and inter-governmental cooperation

  

  • Received:2018-10-30 Revised:2019-10-09 Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-03-03

科技领域环境规制政策演进研究

张振华1,张国兴2,马亮3,刘薇1   

  1. 1. 兰州大学管理学院
    2.
    3. 中国人民大学公共管理学院
  • 通讯作者: 张振华
  • 基金资助:
    政府职能转变背景下绩效管理研究;中国环境规制科技政策的有效性研究;跨域环境规制政策的演变分析及其绩效评价;政策协同视角下的京津冀大气污染治理机制研究

Abstract: Based on the policy quantitative scoring method and social network analysis method, this paper quantitatively studies 219 environmental regulatory policies in the scientific and technological (S&T) fields formulated in China from 1978 to 2016 in the dimensions of policy attributes, policy objectives, policy instruments, and inter-department cooperation network, and then effectively combs the evolutionary logic of policy changes and inter-governmental cooperation. This paper shows that there are varying degrees of changes in the number of environmental regulation policies in S&T field, the coordination of policy departments, and the policy contents such as policy objectives and policy instruments. The evolution logic of the environmental regulation policies in S&T fields is mainly manifested in four aspects, which are the continuous improvement of the policy mechanism, the short-term emergency effects of the promulgation policy, the long-term superposition effect of the cumulative policy, and continuous strengthening of inter-department cooperation. Finally, this paper proposes related policy recommendations from the perspective of systematic top-level design, improvement of policy attributes, continuous optimization of policy objectives and policy instruments, and strengthening inter-governmental cooperation.

摘要: 基于政策量化打分方法和社会网络分析方法,从政策属性、政策目标、政策工具以及政策制定府际合作网络等方面对我国1978至2016年制定的219条科技领域环境规制政策进行文献量化研究,进而有效梳理科技领域环境规制政策变迁和府际合作的演进逻辑。研究表明,我国科技领域环境规制政策的演进逻辑主要表现在政策机制不断完善、颁布政策的短期应急效应、累积政策的长期叠加效应以及部门合作不断强化等四个方面。最后,从制度层面的系统性顶层设计、政策属性力度的完善、政策目标与政策工具的持续优化以及政策制定府际合作的强化角度提出了政策建议。