Studies in Science of Science ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1671-1679.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Innovation Management Paradigm -- from the Perspective of Gender

  

  • Received:2018-08-21 Revised:2018-12-18 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-09-15

创新管理范式的解构与重塑——性别化的视角解析

吴欣桐1,陈劲2   

  1. 1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地清华大学技术创新研究中心
    2. 清华大学经济管理学院
  • 通讯作者: 陈劲
  • 基金资助:

    公共文化科技服务能力建设与绩效评估体系及共性技术研究;中国企业的原始创新:动力、机制与模式;责任式创新的共性理论基础与作用机理研究

Abstract: The theoretical research of innovation management needs to be expanded with the reality and theoretical evolution. The deconstruction and reconstruction of innovation management paradigm, is a process of adding gender dimension into innovation management theories. It helps to improve the quality of innovations, to undertake the responsibilities of gender equality and to achieve social benefits. Gendered innovation management integrates feminist science, gender and science, gender and management practice, gender and innovation practice, as well as innovation management. Based on the whole process model of innovation, by using three kinds of gendered innovation strategies (fixing the institutions, fixing the knowledge, fixing the number), this research proposes the gendered fragmentation and reconstruction of technological innovation, including innovation strategy, plan, innovation project portfolio, creative development, R&D, manufacturing, commercialization and phased adjustment. It contributes to solve the gender blindness in the original innovation management process, constantly revise and improve the gender value orientation, achieve the feasibility of multiple integration in innovation management, as well as enhance humanistic care and moral acceptability.

摘要: 创新管理的理论研究需要随着现实情境和理论演进而不断拓展。对创新管理范式进行性别化的解构和重塑,是在创新管理研究成果之中加入性别维度、进行理论的性别化再建构和反思,有助于提升创新成果的质量、承担对两性的责任、实现社会普惠。性别化的创新管理,融合了女性主义科学史、性别与科学技术、性别与管理实践、性别与创新实践、创新管理的理论成果,是以创新全过程模型为基础,通过“修正制度、修正知识和修正数量”三种性别化创新策略,对创新战略制定、创新计划制定、创新项目组合、创意发展、研发和设计、生产制造、商业化和阶段性调整八个阶段实现性别化解构和重塑,从而解决原有创新管理过程的性别盲视问题、不断修正和完善创新管理的性别价值倾向性,实现创新管理中多元融合的可行性、提升人文关怀和道德可接受性。