Abstract: Based on plentiful data and information this paper is intended to carry out systematic analysis of the dilemma caused by current global scientific research evaluation criteria focusing on the citations, JIFs and ESI, furthermore, the paper also explains the inner contradictions between quantitative evalution and quantitive evaluation and demonstrates the necessities and urgency of global scientific community’s efforts to solve relevant problems.

摘要： 本文结合若干实证数据资料，对当前科研评价中以论文引用频次、期刊影响因子、ESI学科评价来判断科技水平高低导致的二难困境进行了系统性分析，论述了“量化评价”与“内涵评价”之间的内在矛盾，阐明了当今科研共同体需要努力正视并逐步解决这一困局的紧迫性和必要性。