• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2012, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1449-1453.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

如何看待科学顾问的身份困境?

尹雪慧1,李正风2   

  1. 1. 清华大学人文社会科学学院科技与社会研究所;中共新疆维吾尔自治区委员会党校
    2. 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-19 修回日期:2012-07-24 出版日期:2012-10-15 发布日期:2012-10-26
  • 通讯作者: 尹雪慧
  • 基金资助:
    本文获清华大学“2010年博士生科研创新基金”和中国科普研究所“2011年度研究生科普研究能力提升类项目”支持。

How to Understand the Identity Dilemma of Science Advisers?

  • Received:2011-10-19 Revised:2012-07-24 Online:2012-10-15 Published:2012-10-26

摘要: 随着社会知识化进程的不断推进,公共政策制定越来越需要科学和技术专业知识的支持,科学发现和技术发展对政策的影响已经形成一个独特的问题域,科学顾问成为当代政策制定过程中有重要影响的社会角色。然而,随着科学的客观性和知识的确定性被打破,专业知识和科学顾问对决策的指导作用也受到了质疑和挑战。本文认为,决策情境中事实判断和价值判断的相互纠缠和相互冲突,科学探究中认知真理性与政治决策中价值合理性可能出现的摩擦,导致了科学顾问的身份困境。本文将分析这一困境出现的原因,探讨科学顾问角色的新内涵,以进一步理解专业知识和科学家在决策中的独特作用及其限度。

关键词: 科学顾问, 决策, 价值共识, 事实, Science advisor, Decision-making, Consensus of value, Truth

Abstract: With the continuous social progress by knowledge drive contemporary public policy making need more support from scientific and technical expertise. Implications of Scientific discovery and technological development for policy have become a unique problem domain, scientific adviser also has become an influential role in today's policy-making process. With breakdown of knowledge certainty and scientific objectivity,the roles of expertise and advisers in decision-making has been questioned and challenged. This paper argues that, fact judgment and value judgment is both in decision-making situation, the truth of scientific advice and value in political decision constitute a dilemma of science advisers. Based on such viewpoint, we will analyze the reason for this dilemma appear to,explore the role connotation of science advisers, and try to re-understanding on limitation and unique role of specialized knowledge and scientists in decision-making.

中图分类号: