关键词: E.T.波尔曼事件, 黄禹锡事件, 陈进事件, 科研不端行为, 调查与处理, 程序正义及效用, the Poehlman case, the Woo Suk Hwang case, the Chenjin case, research misconduct, investigate and deal with, justice and utility of procedure

Abstract: Through a comparative analysis on their procedures of investigating and dealing with research misconduct, based on some typical cases as the Poehlman case, the Woo Suk Hwang case, the Chenjin case in the United States, South Korea and China, it showed: because a sound system and mechanism preventing research misconduct having been set up, the United States not only had a correct, timely and secret procedure of investigation and disposal, but also could play an important role about fair, just and utility of procedure; although no laws and regulations preventing research misconduct, the utilitarian South Korea could either correctly, timely and effectively investigate and deal with the Woo Suk Hwang case, or actively establish a correlative prevent systems; faced with similar incident, China appeared some shortcomings of legislation, system and procedure dealing with research misconduct, but it actively promoted the correlative system construction.