• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1447-1453.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

科学共同体实现公共责任的途径选择分析

胡春艳   

  1. 中南大学公共管理学院公共管理系
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-04 修回日期:2014-08-07 出版日期:2014-10-15 发布日期:2014-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 胡春艳
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学青年基金(71303262);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(12YBA322);“十二五”湖南省重点学科资助项(湘教发[2011]76号)

The Analysis on Approaches of Scientific Community Achieving Public Accountability

  • Received:2014-05-04 Revised:2014-08-07 Online:2014-10-15 Published:2014-10-20

摘要: 在科学活动过程中,科学共同体不仅要面临来自同行之间的各种权力冲突还要面对来自外界的权力冲突,这种活动已经不仅仅是智力或认知过程,而成为了一种利益竞争和政治过程,如何防止少数科学技术精英利用自身的话语权谋求个人利益一直是科技管理领域的重要问题。当代西方民主理论认为公共责任是遏制权力滥用、实现政府善治的有效途径,通过引入政治学和公共行政领域的公共责任理论,分析科学共同体的公共责任的定义及表现形式,并从法律、政治、治理和伦理方面探讨了使其实现公共责任的途径,以期为公众提供更好的科学技术服务。

Abstract: In the process of scientific activities, the scientific community is not only faced with all the power conflicts between peers,also with the ones from the outside, which is not simply the intellectual or cognitive process, but a kind of profits competing and political process, how to prevent a handful of scientific elites use their discourse power to pursue personal benefits has become a common concern for the current management of science and technology.Contemporary democratic theorists believe that public accountability is an effective way to curb the abuse of power and achieve good governance. It is introduced public accountability theory in the field of political science and public administration into our study, the definition and kinds of public accountability of scientific community are deeply analyzed,and from aspects of the legal, political, governance,ethical,the approaches to achieving the public accountability is put forward,so as to provide better science and technology services to the public.