关键词: 两花之争, 程序性方法论, 科学实践哲学

Abstract: In August 2014, the problem of the debate of Lonicera japonica Thunb and Flos Lonicerae became the academic and public focus. By tracking the formation process of the actor-network of identifying Lonicera japonica Thunb, we find that National Pharmacopoeia Committee made the classification conclusion by the final lab reports. However, its programming methodology basis is inadequate. The reason is that the lab activity is situated, such as the social intervention, the experimenters’ skills, the conflicts of modern science and technology and local knowledge and benefits. All are included into the process of experiment and inspection. Therefore, in order to make sure the scientific and reasonable classification of Lonicera japonica Thunb and Flos Lonicerae, National Pharmacopoeia Committee should participate in the whole experimental and inspective process for management and supervision and introduce the third party independent inspection agency.