• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 2215-2222.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

“融合式研究”的新范式及其评估框架研究

肖小溪1,刘文斌2,徐芳3,陈捷1,李晓轩1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
    2. 英国肯特大学商学院
    3. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-08 修回日期:2018-01-10 出版日期:2018-12-15 发布日期:2018-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 李晓轩
  • 基金资助:

    融合科学领域竞争优势国际比较的理论和方法研究;基于证据链的学术影响力定量评价方法研究

Studies on new paradigm of “Convergence Research” and its evaluation framework

  • Received:2017-11-08 Revised:2018-01-10 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2018-12-15

摘要: 在科技创新驱动经济社会发展的大趋势下,融合式研究成为以解决重大经济社会问题为目标的科研创新新范式。基于文献调研和中科院试点评估实践,本文对这种新范式的特点进行了分析,研究提出了融合式研究的评估逻辑模型,并在此基础上构建了包含四个关键方面的融合式研究评估框架:解决问题的效果评估、学科发展的融合程度评估、创新活动的融合程度评估、权益相关方的融合程度评估。对此四项关键内容,本文提出了一些评估的具体思路和方法,为进一步探索融合式研究的评估理论和实践提供了重要的研究基础。

Abstract: In the trend of employing science, technology and innovation to drive social and economic developments, convergence research has been promoted as the new paradigm addressing grand societal and economic challenges in recent years. Based on literature review and pilot evaluation in Chinese Academy of Sciences, major characteristics of this new paradigm were analyzed in this article, which were foundation for the logic model to evaluation convergence research. Then the evaluation framework of convergence research was formed, which provided the theoretical and practical basis for future studies of convergence research. This evaluation framework was composed by four key modules as below: evaluating the effect of solving societal and economic challenges; evaluating the convergence effect of multiple disciplines; evaluating the convergence effect of diverse innovation activities; evaluating the convergence effect of different stakeholders. Moreover, some detail methods and techniques were included for each of the above four modules.