• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 754-768.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    

利益相关者网络演化视角下CoPS创新风险研究

李春友1,盛亚2   

  1. 1. 浙江工商大学杭州商学院
    2. 浙江工商大学
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-31 修回日期:2017-10-14 出版日期:2018-04-15 发布日期:2018-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 李春友
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金重点项目;国家自然科学基金面上项目;浙江省自然科学基金重点项目

Complex products and systems innovation risk research based on the stakeholder network evolution perspective: A longitudinal case study

  • Received:2017-05-31 Revised:2017-10-14 Online:2018-04-15 Published:2018-04-20

摘要: 近年来,中国复杂产品系统(CoPS)快速发展的同时风险事故频发,亟待理论界关注。为打开CoPS创新风险生成的黑箱,本文基于利益相关者网络演化视角,构建了利益相关者网络、机会主义行为和CoPS创新风险的分析框架,对三代AP1000核电自主化依托项目SM核电站2号机组2002-2016年的创新过程进行了嵌入性纵向单案例研究。研究发现:不同的CoPS创新阶段利益相关者网络的结构是不同的,系统集成商和利益相关者的权利对称程度也是不同的;系统集成商和利益相关者追求权利对称状态是利益相关者网络在不同CoPS创新阶段上演化的一种内在驱动力;当利益相关者权利不对称时,有可能通过实施机会主义行为达到权利对称的目的,而机会主义行为容易诱发CoPS创新风险。

Abstract: In recent years, complex products and systems (CoPS) in China is developing rapidly, risk accidents happened very often at the same time, the theoretical circle should attach great importance to this phenomenon. To open the black box of CoPS innovation risk, based on the stakeholder network evolution perspective, this paper builds risk analysis framework: the stakeholder network, opportunistic behavior and CoPS innovation risk, and analyzes 2002-2016 years of innovation process of the country’s self-reliance program in Gen III nuclear power technology AP1000 SM nuclear power plant unit 2 project. The results show: the innovation network structures are different in different stages of CoPS, the symmetry degree of the system integrator and stakeholders’ right is different; system integrator and stakeholders pursuing right symmetric state is the inner driving force of stakeholder networks evolution in different CoPS innovation phases; when the right of stakeholders is asymmetric, stakeholders are possible to do opportunism behaviors to achieve rights symmetry, the opportunism behaviors are possible to induce CoPS innovation risk.