• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 1610-1614.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

科研项目承担单位信用内涵及形成机理研究

肖小溪,李晓轩   

  1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-18 修回日期:2017-12-20 出版日期:2018-09-15 发布日期:2018-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 肖小溪
  • 基金资助:

    科学基金依托单位信用评价的指标与方法研究

Studies on Connotation and Mechanism of Organizational Credits for Research Program Performers: from the Perspective of Contractual Relationship

  • Received:2017-10-18 Revised:2017-12-20 Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-09-20

摘要: 科技界的信用管理是近年来我国科研管理的一个重要趋势,对科研项目承担单位进行信用管理更是国家政策的最新要求。要支撑相关政策的落实,该研究聚焦于“科研项目承担单位的信用”这一概念的内涵和形成机理。通过契约关系的视角,明确了科研项目资助机构和承担单位之间的契约关系是科研项目承担单位信用的基础,且契约的不完全性决定了信用的不完全性。进一步从动态博弈模型出发,构建了科研项目承担单位信用的基本模型,揭示了信用形成的机理。最后,结合我国实际,提出了该研究对未来相关政策制定的启示。

Abstract: Credit management has been an important trends in science and technology policy and management in recent years, and management on organizational credits for research program performers is actually a new requirement on national level. To support the relevant policies, the focus of this article is the connotation and mechanism of the concept of “organizational credits”. From the perspective of contractual relationship, it is demonstrated that contractual relationship between research program performers and funding agencies is the basis for the former’s organizational credit, and the imperfection of contract actually determines the imperfection of credit. Then the basic model of organizational credit is constructed to illustrate the form mechanism of credit. Finally, combined with facts and situations in Chinese science and technology communities, some relevant suggestions about future policy making in credit managements are raised.