• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 1316-1325.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

企业层创新生态系统结构与协同机制研究

孙聪1,魏江2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学管理学院
    2. 浙江大学紫金港校区管理学院浙江大学管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-26 修回日期:2018-10-15 出版日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2019-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 孙聪
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目“跨层次、动态视角的联盟网络与企业绩效关系研究”;国家自然科学基金面上项目“跨层次、动态视角的联盟网络与企业绩效关系研究”

The Structure and Collaborative Mechanism of Firm-Level Innovation Ecosystem—A Case Research of Haier Group

  • Received:2018-06-26 Revised:2018-10-15 Online:2019-07-15 Published:2019-07-26

摘要: 企业内部形成的创新生态系统是组织演化出现的新形态,通过对海尔集团创新生态系统运作进行扎根分析,发现海尔创新生态系统构建呈现出内外生态跨层嵌套的特殊结构,系统内创新参与者之间涌现出平台模块耦合、多边网络协同等四个协同机制。本案例主要对创新生态系统的研究做出贡献:(1)构建了企业层面的创新生态系统结构,系统内部成员作为独立主体参与外部生态活动,形成生态嵌套结构,打破了已有研究从宏观层面出发将企业视为封闭的同质化节点的局限;(2)探索出企业创新生态系统内部创新参与者的关系及结构,提出系统内参与者可通过权威关系和网络效应相组合实现系统治理,是对现有研究只强调核心组织进行持续性主体干预和资源投入来实现系统协同的补充。

Abstract: This paper studies the structure and collaborative mechanism of innovation ecosystem at firm level based on a grounded analysis about Haier Group. The findings show a special cross-layer nested structure of Haier’s innovation ecosystem during its construction process and besides, we find four critical unique collaborative mechanisms in this special structure: coupled platform modular, multilateral network cooperation, internal competition design and hierarchical ecological management, which are not common used in normal innovation ecosystem at macro level. This paper has two important contributions to extant literature about innovation ecosystem: (1) we propose firm-level innovation ecosystem, where actors from inner-enterprises can take part in inside and outside ecological activities as independent subjects simultaneously, and form cross-layer nested structures. This finding breaks the limitation of extant literatures which only focus on innovation system at macro level and treat firms as closed homogeneous nodes. (2) this paper proposes that the collaboration of innovation ecosystem can be fulfilled by the logic of network effect and authority, where previous studies majorly focus on persistent leader intervention and resource investment.